• Upgrade Your Fandom

    Join the Ultimate Colorado Rockies Community for just $48 in your first year!

Your eyes aren't lying to you about closer Wade Davis

Drew Creasman Avatar
August 1, 2020
USATSI 13233555 168383315 lowres

It’s a question on the minds of all Rockies fans following Friday night’s game against the San Diego Padres:

Should you trust your eyes when it comes to closer Wade Davis and his lack of success going back to last year?

Oftentimes in baseball, we have to preach analyzing process over results and implore those who wish to take a more measured approach to the game to avoid reaching conclusions over small sample size data.

In this instance, we have a case where all the evidence is coming together to show that Davis just isn’t the guy he once was.

He’s not the  All-Star who dominated late games through the middle part of the last decade. He’s not even the guy who set the Rockies franchise mark for saves in 2018.

There are two primary reasons for this decline: a steady drop in velocity and an increasingly inconsistent ability to locate pitches.

Where’d My Velo Go?

At his peak, Davis’ four-seem fastball averaged over 96 MPH in 2014 and 2015 according to StatCast. He was known to regularly dial up 97-98 MPH when really needing it.

The year before Colorado acquired him, the velo had dropped down to a 94.4 MPH average and his first year in Denver saw a subtle, but further drop to 93.8 MPH. In 2019, when Davis was among the worst relievers in all of baseball, his average fastball fell even more to 93.2 MPH.

So far in 2020, he is sitting at a troubling 91.4 MPH and throughout this period, his cutter has experienced a similar drop from 93.2 MPH to 89.1 MPH.

Since he has always relied on this combo – throwing his four-seemer 47.9 percent of the time and his cutter 25.4 percent of the time, amounting to 73.3 percent of his offerings – the dip in quality of both pitches has had major impact.

Currently, some of the drop in velocity may be attributable to the lack of a typical Spring Training. To be fair, it’s also very early in an otherwise unusual year.

While pitchers tend to round into their best form after several appearances, the pattern is clearly trending in the wrong direction.

The belt-high fastball to Fernando Tatis Jr. with two outs in the ninth that officially blew his first save of 2020 came in at 92 MPH.

Location, Location, Location

Plenty of pitchers in the history of our sport have figured out how to reinvent themselves as age naturally begins to sap the speed of their fastball. This happens when they figure out how to live on the edges of the strike zone and use movement and deception to create outs where once they could use brute force.

Davis has gone the other direction.

As a strikeout-heavy guy throughout his career, he has always had issues keeping the walks down. Again his peak came in 2014 and 2015 with the Royals when he walked 2.88 and 2.67 batters per nine innings, respectively. Other than that though, he hung around in the mid to low threes, including 3.58 in his first year with the Rox.

Oddly enough, that was a marked improvement over his previous year with the Cubs where he posted a then-career-high 4.30 BB/9. He blew that out of the water in 2019 when his command issues came front and center with an eye-popping 6.12 BB/9 rate.

He has already walked three batters in 2.2 IP this season, which is a small sample size BB/9 rate of 10.13.

And it isn’t just the walks.

Screenshot 107

As you can see from these charts of the pitches he has thrown so far this year, also provided by StatCast, Davis is either missing well out of the zone or in remarkably hittable locations.

You can live with that spread on the change-up but the curve isn’t getting beneath the zone, hanging up where it can be hit in the air. The times he has gotten the cutter low it’s been too low to be tempting. And the number of fastballs at the top and middle of the zone, which are much easier to drive in the air, dramatically outweigh the handful on the lower and outer edges.

So in addition to the rising walk rates, his strikeout rate is also staggering off from 10.74 K/9 in 2018 to 8.86 K/9 in 2019 to just one strikeout so far this season.

Trust Your Eyes

The results of steadily declining velocity, climbing walk rates, plummeting strikeout rates, and generally far more pitches winding up in locations that neither the catcher or pitcher wanted?

Davis has seen his Barrel Percent (how often he gets squared up) rise from 4.5 percent in 2018 to 7.5 percent in 2019. In 2020 so far, it sits at a whopping 20 percent.

Davis is failing not as the result of bad luck or being bested by elite hitters making great plays; rather, he’s throwing more and more pitches that are either well out of the zone or in very hittable spots without the electricity they once had.

So, trust your eyes. And trust these numbers.

Davis isn’t who he once was anymore.

That doesn’t necessarily mean he needs to be cut from the roster. There is further data that shows he has been adept at preventing runs out on the road and has done better in non-high-leverage situations even through all these struggles.

Also, with the expanded rosters, there isn’t exactly a desperate need to call up an additional reliever when Colorado has three pitchers in the ‘pen who haven’t even been used yet.

But he shouldn’t be closing games anymore and arguably shouldn’t be pitching in any close games at Coors Field until something dramatic changes with his velocity, location and deceptiveness.

He could be of use in low-leverage, innings-eating spots, especially with the experience he has under his belt.

With Jairo Díaz and Carlos Estévez growing more and more confident, Daniel Bard and Tyler Kinley also showcasing “closer stuff” and Scott Oberg hoping for a return soon, the Rockies also have plenty of other options to close out games.

Currently, after the four-run, two-homer implosion against the Padres, Davis has an ERA of 16.88. Bard is at 3.86.

As for everyone else in the Colorado Rockies bullpen… no one has surrendered even a run.

Comments

Share your thoughts

Join the conversation

The Comment section is only for diehard members

Open comments +

Scroll to next article

Don't like ads?
Don't like ads?
Don't like ads?