No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Rockies Community!

Dodgers add insult to injury with ninth inning blowout

Patrick Lyons
Patrick Lyons
July 31, 2019
Dodgers add insult to injury with ninth inning blowout

Author

Patrick Lyons avatar
Patrick Lyons

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (1 conversation)

Mary Pace

Mary Pace

August 1, 2019

Questions for podcast
RE: Rockies closers
I read somewhere (“Moneyball” book maybe?) that it was a waste of money to overspend on closers, 1) because the position is so volatile, and, most interesting, 2) because, in the opinion of the analyst/GM/or whoever, you can “train anyone to be a closer”. What are your thoughts on this strategy, and is it something the Rockies could adopt in some form?

RE: the overall pitching struggles
Do we know which pitchers went to Driveline (or similar) for extra offseason training? Has it helped those pitchers? If NOT, why? Does it just take time for certain adjustments to take hold? Or, is it possible there is some conflict or confusion between the offseason training & the Rockies organizational pitching philosophy?

Mary Pace Replying to Mary Pace
Patrick Lyons

Patrick Lyons

Author
August 4, 2019

1. Outside of a rare few relievers, there’s no way of predicting consistency for relievers. Bryan Shaw and Wade Davis were definitely in the consistent/reliable category of relievers and we’ve seen what they do at altitude. So, for Colorado, they may never spend on relievers ever again.

2. Players can learn how to close. Also, the highest leverage situations aren’t always the one’s that come up in the ninth inning, so saving your team’s best reliever for the biggest spot in the game is the best strategy, theoretically. It’s one of the reasons why the concept of the Opener was created.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article