No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Denver Broncos Community!

No matter the path, you better hope the Broncos’ next quarterback is going to cost a lot

Zac Stevens
Zac Stevens
March 11, 2018
No matter the path, you better hope the Broncos’ next quarterback is going to cost a lot

Author

Zac Stevens avatar
Zac Stevens

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (6 conversations)

Steve Cañon

Steve Cañon

March 11, 2018

I get the feeling that the Kubiak connection will bring Keenum to Denver.

Mark in Hawaii

Mark in Hawaii

March 11, 2018

Agree Zac. Everyone needs to accept that for Kirk Cousins’ caliber of proven talent, $30M+ is now the market price. And it’s not just because of the broader sample size of the quality stats he’s proven on the field. Zac have you and Ryan had a chance to watch and listened to him mic’ed up in NFL Films’ “Sound FX?”

If not I recommend everyone go to YouTube and check these video clips out, as well as some of the other interviews where he opens up about what makes him tick. It gives us a glimpse of who he is, the kind of teammate he is, and most importantly the kind of leader we would be investing in. I feel that his ceiling hasn’t been reached yet, and as exciting it would be to gamble on one of these hot draft prospects, I think $30M – $35M is worth the investment on Cousins.

And final question. Do you see the recent Tyrod Taylor trade to the Browns as showing their hand a bit that they are probably out of the FA QB competition and are now more likely to rely on the draft for their future signal caller?

Mahalo!

Noreik

Noreik

March 11, 2018

Big difference between Lynch and Wentz and Goff though. And most people seem to agree that there’s not a massive difference between top 3, maybe top 5 at a push?

Would like to see Barkley go at 1 if no Cousins to leave at least 2 QBs left at 5. Maybe move up to 3 or 4 as at least one of Rosen, Darnold or Mayfield will still be there. Where would a trade for #5, #40 and 1st rounder next year get us?

If there’s no-one left that we REALLY want, i.e. a QB that Elway/Joseph/Musgrove don’t like then, as painful as it would be, get Saquon if he’s there or another long term player (Nelson or Tremaine Edmunds or trade down to get more picks) then scout the hell out of next year’s QBs and throw everything at trading up from, hopefully somewhere in the high 20s.

Noreik Replying to Noreik
Zac Stevens

Zac Stevens

Author
March 11, 2018

Hey! Trading #5, #40 and 1st rounder next year should get you up to No. 1 or 2. I don’t think the Broncos are in a position to wait for a QB until next year, so whether it’s a trade to 1, 2 or 3 I think it’s really important to do whatever needed to get the QB if they don’t land one in the draft.

Zac Stevens Replying to Zac Stevens
Preston_Nibaur

Preston_Nibaur

March 12, 2018

I have to agree. We have heard Ryan and Zac make the very valid point that 4 (maybe 5) different guys are the number one QB on NFL boards throughout the league. That’s incredibly rare. And we’re lucky to be in the position to land one of them. If we don’t get a stud in FA, and in my opinion that’s Kirk Cousins only, we have to draft our QB of the future. And if that means trading up to 1 or 2 so be it. It will cost a lot. But at number 5 we can do it without completely jeopardizing our set of draft picks.

Preston_Nibaur

Preston_Nibaur

March 11, 2018

We start taking about all these QBs and their cost. But it’s starting to feel like the market may not be that big for a couple of these guys. I have no idea which teams want McCarron as a starter. The Browns obviously won’t be paying up now. I honestly don’t even know who wants Keenum badly enough to pay him $22 mil. Maybe Arizona or Denver. I obviously know there will be a market. But there’s only so many teams that will want a QB. And if someone like the Jets land Bridgewater or McCarron, will they really be willing to pay up and jump Denver for a QB? Saquon is essentially a lock to go top 4 now. Honestly, I think the Browns need to take him at #1 with Tyrod on the roster.

I know you guys like scenarios. At least you do Zac. I think it’d be fun to hear where you think all the QB needy teams end up with and who Denver would ultimately have at QB next year assuming Kirk chooses Minnesota.

Preston_Nibaur Replying to Preston_Nibaur
Zac Stevens

Zac Stevens

Author
March 11, 2018

Thanks, Preston! We’ll talk about that scenario on the pod. All valid points, too. What’s important to remember is even if Keenum is at a “discounted” $17 million, that’s still 10 percent of the salary cap!

Zac Stevens Replying to Zac Stevens
Zac Stevens

Zac Stevens

Author
March 11, 2018

It’s getting harder and harder to ignore that. I agree, Steve!

Zac Stevens Replying to Zac Stevens
Zac Stevens

Zac Stevens

Author
March 11, 2018

Hey Mark! I haven’t watched that, but I certainly will, thanks for the recommendation!

I agree with you, I don’t think Cousins’ ceiling has been reached either. I think he’s at worst a top-10 QB and a very, very good leader.

I don’t think the Browns are in the FA QB competition anymore after acquiring Tyrod, but there is still a very strong chance that they draft a QB with picks 1 or 4. My guess is they go Saquon No. 1 and QB No. 4.

Zac Stevens Replying to Zac Stevens
Mark in Hawaii

Mark in Hawaii

March 12, 2018

Thanks for the reply over the weekend! I agree that they’ll probably go Saquon #1 and a QB at #4.

It’s Monday and Brees still unsigned. All is now fair game!

Zac Stevens Replying to Zac Stevens
Preston_Nibaur

Preston_Nibaur

March 12, 2018

Thanks for the response! And on a Sunday no less. Always working hard for the people!

ziggity187

ziggity187

March 11, 2018

Paxton’s tall

Spacebar

Spacebar

March 12, 2018

Yet, we are that much closer to getting Drew Brees!

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article