No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Denver Broncos Community!

Here’s why the Broncos’ offense remains in intensive care despite Drew Lock’s efficient work in Week 16

Andrew Mason
Andrew Mason
December 28, 2021
Here’s why the Broncos’ offense remains in intensive care despite Drew Lock’s efficient work in Week 16

Author

Andrew Mason avatar
Andrew Mason

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (1 conversation)

Mark from CO

Mark from CO

December 28, 2021

Andrew: Say what you want, but Drew was the Broncos best offense performer on Sunday (confirmed by some 3rd party analytics and by the ‘eye’ test). I don’t know if he will become a capable starter or not… …maybe not. But I do know that the Broncos have been terrible at developing him. Progress at the end of his first year, but let’s get rid of his offensive coordinator. New coordinator installs an offense that does not play to Lock’s strength. Covid hits and no offseason. Still progress at the end of the year. Not willing to live with his growing pains (i.e. mistakes), so let’s bring in another QB and have an open competition. A competition which some in the media continue to report that Drew threw fewer interceptions than TB. At the end of the day, Vic has more serious matters to deal with (his job) and selects TB. Perhaps I am rationalizing DL’s continued mistakes. But I don’t think the coaching staff, nor many (if not most) of the media were ready to live with DL’s mistakes as he developed. Vic’s comment yesterday – “I wasn’t terribly disappointed” in DL’s performance says it all. An awful way to describe your assessment of your best offensive player. Yet in poor performances, Vic gives TB the benefit of the doubt, if not kuddos. Lots of words… …in short, the Broncos will continue to fail at QB selection until they commit to a sound development process, and be willing to take the lumps that the process will entail.

Mark from CO Replying to Mark from CO
Andrew Mason

Andrew Mason

Author
December 28, 2021

Being the best performer on an offense that had 8 first downs, 158 yards and only two drives longer than 25 yards isn’t exactly grand praise.

PFF ranking: 88.5, 3rd among QBs this week

ESPN QBR: 44.1, 18th

EPA/play: -0.03, 25th

Completion pct. over expected (CPOE): 2%, 17th

Never go by one analytic. That’s why I have always gone for an across-the-board approach. PFF says he was great, to the point of nearly being at Joe Burrow’s level (which is patently absurd). Others say he was average. And clearly Shurmur’s tactics were about minimizing his deficiencies, thus the emphasis on under-center, play-action work and first reads when he was in the shotgun. Lock still struggles to process the entire field when it’s not cut in half out of play-action, which puts a low ceiling on his long-term potential.

Andrew Mason Replying to Andrew Mason
Mark from CO

Mark from CO

December 28, 2021

Andrew:

I think you missed my point. My point wasn’t on Sunday’s game per se. (But listening to your colleagues from various media outlets – many say DL had a good game, even perhaps his best given the circumstances and he was not the problem). My point is that the Broncos have done a horrible job developing the QB position historically. I think you can easily argue there is no real process and no real patience to be willing to take the lumps of developing a QB, particularly one drafted in the 2nd round and one who everyone agreed had a (perhaps considerable) way to go. This is a case where many things may be right – DL may not be an NFL caliber quarterback, but it is also true the Broncos have done him absolutely no favors in terms of development. It may also be correct that the Broncos coaching staff, the media and fans do not have the requisite patience to develop a young QB.

One last point. Using analytics on this offense to differentiate what is going on is fraught with danger. The fact is this offense, and with what we’ve been told by the Bronco staff and media is better personnel, is effectively no better with a “better” and “born leader” at QB – TB, than was last year’s offense with a raw and “error prone” and immature QB – DL. Perhaps the real problem is the offensive system, which functions the same no matter who seems to be the QB. A system, I would argue is a QB killer.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article