Colorado’s season ended in brutal fashion with a 3-2 Game 7 loss to the San Jose Sharks on Wednesday night, kicking off the team’s offseason. Given the on-ice success they just experienced, it’s fair to say the Avalanche have a big summer ahead of them as they look to add to their organization in hopes of taking steps forward.
This is shaping up to be one of the most important summers in Avalanche history as what they do will have a large say in how soon (or even if) the Avalanche win their next Stanley Cup.
It’s a robust to-do list but let’s take a look at what they have on the docket for this summer.
1. Re-sign Mikko Rantanen
This one is obvious and also might be the one that takes the longest to get done. Avalanche fans should prepare themselves for a lengthy negotiation, one that might even stretch into September as training camp nears. The RFA market this summer is absolutely loaded with talent (Mitch Marner, Matthew Tkachuk, Patrik Laine, Brayden Point, Sebastian Aho, etc.) and it’s going to take a while for all of those teams to sort out the markets for these guys. It’s the kind of summer that resets the market for young stars coming off their ELC.
Rantanen won’t come cheap as his first three seasons saw him score at least 20 goals in each year and the last two years he scored 171 points in 155 games. He followed up his 87-point regular season by leading the playoffs with 14 points before the Avs were eliminated. Regardless of how much of his production you believe is tied to him playing alongside Nathan MacKinnon, those are superstar numbers.
The real rub is what the young wingers are going to make. The center market has just found its way north of $10 million in the last few years with Connor McDavid and Auston Matthews breaking the bank on their post-ELC deals. Rantanen isn’t a center, however, and there’s a fair question as to how much of his production is the result of playing next to MacKinnon just as he turned into a superstar. It’s obviously a great problem to have but trying to parse production for purposes of pay is a tricky proposition.
Mark Stone was set to be one of the premier free agents this summer and he signed an extension with Vegas at $9.5 million per year. While Rantanen has been more productive than Stone, Stone is also an elite defensive winger on top of a point-per-game player. Teams also pay more for UFAs than RFAs, making this quite an interesting contract negotiation.
Colorado has historically been slower to sign their RFAs when arbitration is not involved (remember Nikita Zadorov two years ago?) but Joe Sakic had no issues signing Matt Duchene, Gabe Landeskog, or MacKinnon when their deals were up (in Landeskog’s case, a year early, in fact). It all sets up for an interesting summer. Sakic has previously told BSN Denver Rantanen will be in Colorado for a long time. It’s on him to make that become a truth this summer.
2. Clean up their cap sheet
Rantanen is certainly the highest profile player for Colorado who doesn’t have a contract beyond this season but he most definitely isn’t alone. The Avs finished the season with 49 of 50 contract slots filled and 26 of them are free agents this summer. Of those 26, 15 are RFAs and 10 of those are arbitration-eligible. Philipp Grubauer is the only goaltender signed for next year.
Colorado hasn’t been shy about going to arbitration in the past as it ensures a player is signed by early August at the latest. They haven’t actually gone through a hearing since Tyson Barrie three summers ago and even then they settled before a ruling was announced. Point being arbitration is not quite the evil it used to be so if Colorado files for arbitration with several of those 10 players, it’s just the process playing out.
Zadorov, Alexander Kerfoot, and J.T. Compher are all guys who could find themselves involved in arbitration this summer. Colorado has a lot of work to do with half of their organization up for new contracts.
3. Sort out the goaltending
As mentioned above, Grubauer is the only goaltender currently under contract at any level of the organization. Semyon Varlamov is a UFA and it sure looks like he lost his job at the end of the season. We know he isn’t really looking for a backup job so it’s fair to think he tests the market this summer in search of a team willing to give him a look as a starter.
The organization could essentially start over at the position if it wanted to but I’ll toss a suggestion their way just in case they’re reading:
- Re-sign Pavel Francouz and give him the backup job. It’s a risk with the limited NHL action he saw this year but he was a major factor in the Colorado Eagles making the AHL postseason. The Avs brought him over for depth and he certainly did his part in earning a look at the next level. Give it to him.
- Let Spencer Martin walk. It simply hasn’t worked out but you have to respect the strong second half he had.
- Sign Adam Werner to an ELC and let him be the backup for the Eagles. Werner has improved every year since being drafted and he took the leap to the SHL this year and played very well. Time to give him a chance.
- The relationship with Joe Cannata has worked out just fine for both sides. Bring him back to be the Eagles third goalie and the starter for the Utah Grizzlies. Don’t fix what ain’t broke, you know?
- Sign an AHL veteran with some NHL experience to be the starter for the Eagles and the third guy on the Avs’ depth chart.
4. Make a decision on Tyson Barrie
The team has been able to kick the Tyson Barrie can down the road as heir apparent Cale Makar gestated at UMass. Well, Makar showed up and scored six points in 10 playoff games. It’s obviously a small sample size but that’s a 49-point pace across an entire season. Barrie’s primary value is in his point production.
Does Makar’s success mean there’s no room for Barrie? Of course not. But there are financial realities at play here. Barrie is one season away from unrestricted free agency. He’s coming off a career year in which he produced 59 points, the most since Ray Bourque also produced 59. Ray Bourque! The point is, Barrie is very good at what he does well.
Since 2013-14, Barrie is eighth in defenseman scoring (tied with P.K. Subban). He’ll be 29-years-old next summer. If Colorado wants to re-sign him, the most comparable contract would be Keith Yandle’s deal with Florida in 2016. That deal was a seven-year, $44.45 million deal with an AAV of $6.35 million. Barrie currently makes $5.5 million and it’s been three years since the Yandle deal was signed so there’s a fair expectation that Barrie will seek in the neighborhood of an $8 million AAV.
If that’s the route Colorado wants to go, there will be repercussions come expansion draft time but with their decision to play Makar this postseason, that was already guaranteed. If Colorado decides to roll the dice and balance the cap sheet and trade Barrie, they would have to decide on a futures-heavy deal or target a top-six forward in a straight swap. Either decision has its pros and cons and we’ll breakdown the Barrie situation in-depth more as the summer goes on. But it’s definitely come time for the team to make a decision. Losing him in free agency for free next summer would be a painful step backward as they look to go into a more competitive era.
5. Tread carefully in free agency
Colorado is set to have just shy of $36 million to spend in free agency. Obviously, keeping the RFAs mentioned above will chew into a healthy portion of that. They’ll still have enough to chase after the big fish that will likely be making it to market this year.
Artemi Panarin, Erik Karlsson, Jeff Skinner, and Sergei Bobrovsky are just some of the names who might make it to market. There’s always a temptation to spend when you have money and obvious needs and the market could be flush with top-six forwards, by far Colorado’s biggest area of need right now. How the team feels about Tyson Jost’s development and what they decide to do with the fourth overall pick and the expected timeline of that player’s impact will both play a role in how aggressive Colorado gets in free agency.
The UFA market always thins out in the weeks leading up to July 1 so what appears to be a robust class could be significantly weakened by the time the tampering period gets underway. If that happens, the Avalanche need to avoid the major landmines that have saddled some teams with awful long-term situations because they got blinded by recent success and had salary cap space to play with.
Milan Lucic and James Neal, just to name two, serve as cautionary tales for teams who get reckless with money. Colorado should be aggressive in chasing obvious upgrades but if they miss out on the obvious fits, they should be careful about spending money simply for the sake of spending it.

0 Comments (10 conversations)
rockymtnaqua
Keep Gruby as starting G. Already have him signed to a more than reasonable starting G contract. No Bobrovsky.
Panarin would be a bit of a waste of cash because he wouldn’t have a 2C to feed him, and he plays 0 defense.
Skinner I might be ok with because he at least plays some D.
HolidayHippie
Who says he’d be on the second line? Here are some potential lines:
Landy-Mac-Panarin
Kerfoot/Wilson-Jost/Kaut-Rants
Kerfoot/Wilson-Jost/Kaut-Compher
Soda-Kamanev-Calvert
That’s not a bad top 9, and it would certainly provide some secondary scoring. They didn’t do too bad this year. MacRanteSkog they had 7 guys with 10+ goals and 3 with 40+ points.
NoMoreRats
Panarin is a left wing and would be one of the few right handed shot forwards on the team. It wouldn’t make a lot of sense to play him on the right side. I wouldn’t want pull Landskog off the first line either. I think a Panarin – Jost – Rantanen (or Kaut and leave 96 on the first line) second line would be pretty damned effective.
I’d probably put Panarin next to MacKinnon and then Kerfoot on that right side. Then go Landeskog with Jost and Rantanen as your starting top six. Adding a talent like Panarin though means there isn’t really a wrong answer, just a work in progress to find the right chemistry. He’s a special player
mladen
I think renegotiating Nathan Mac’s contract would be a good idea. He’ our best player but could wind up being the 5th or 6th highest paid. Not a healthy situation. Good warning on free agency which is being pimped on other sites. Personally I feel that heavy involvement in the FA market is a result of poor scouting, poor drafting, and poor development. I hate free agent signings.
Cant renegotiate. Hating free agency is like hating the draft or trading. It’s a team building tool. How effective a team is with it will determine a lot.
mladen
Obviously AJ you are correct, but I have an easier time accepting a rookie bust, then free agent but. There’s a lot of history that should help a signing team, then there’ the number of years on the contract if he doesn’t work out. We got lucky with Carl after his performance in the 48 point season, but having 4.5 million on the books for five years if he hadn’t of picked it up. That would be hard to take. I think three year for Clark and Cole was too long, but they won’t sign without a lot of years. At least with draft choices and rookies if they don’t make it, it doesn’t cost a fortune and you don’t have to live with them forever.
WellHungMacK
Bring back the Hamburglar!
avsfan444
This is brutal with typos.
Christopher
AJ, do you have a hunch on which team Kraut will be playing on come next season?
I think it’s a fair assumption that he starts in the AHL with the Eagles but he’ll get an extended look in the preseason to win a job on the Avs.
HolidayHippie
Landy is a left-winger and is left-handed shooting. Having Panarin on the right side as a righty would mean he and Landy would be opposite each other, much like LHD and RHD do. We’ve seen how effective Mac is at finding Barrie off the rush coming down the middle, imagine if that were Panarin or Barrie. Having more options that way could be deadly.
You could just about mix up the top 6 any way you want and get two scary lines. I just don’t think the original commenter’s point about Panarin not having a 2C to feed him is valid.
HolidayHippie
PSA that this comment was supposed to be in reply to one lower down. Hey BSN, can you make comments deletable please?
NoMoreRats
It’s optimal for RHD to play on the right side and LHD to play on the left side because that way their sticks are nearest the boards when they’re facing away from the net they’re defending (no matter whether they’re playing in the offensive or defensive zone – the advantage is the same whether they’re trying to clear pucks or hold them in at the point). It’s less critical for forwards (although it’s nice to have one of each dominant hand on every line for faceoffs depending on which circle they’re in) but the bottom line is if Panarin has spent his entire career playing left wing it’s better to leave him where he feels most comfortable just as you wouldn’t want to move Mikko to LW or Landy to RW. Yes they can certainly play either side but there’s a lot to be said for leaving them where they’re comfortable.
KCRybek
Draft cozens and sign skinner. Have no idea what to do about Barrie. If Timmins is healthy that makes Barrie more expendable.
Ooh my hot pocket is ready
Bouillon91
I think a good option for the top 6 will be to call Bergevin and ask the price for Drouin. He’s having a hard time with the coach in MTL and there was rumors he could be available. Drouin is playing way under the projection scouts had of him when he was picked 3rd overall. Being reunited with MacK could make that superstar potential comes true… What do you guys think about Drouin as a trade target?
Jose
After watching Panarin in the playoffs I was not impressed. As mentioned, he plays ZERO defense, and he did not seem to be much of a team player. He was also weak, soft and squishy along the boards. This just supports your insightful point about being careful in the free agent market. What about big Z?? I would appreciate some brilliant information. As for Barrie-I think that he was pretty darn good this year and is a great guy, but I think that if we ever want to trade him this is the time. Salary caps make it more difficult to have players “for life” on a team. Great read AJ.
Sunfunbun
It’s a no brainer to trade Barrie. Makar is ready to take his O zone starts and PP point position. The trade value of Barrie is as high as it’ll ever get.
His defense is still stick checks; ok, but inconsistent positioning; little physicality, and not the best skating nor puck handling. He’s less of a puck handler than either Sam Girard or Cale Makar, and both are adept at skating the puck out, of our own zone. Makar is a better passer with a much higher hockey IQ than Barrie, as well.
The playoff games showed, as he was forced to take a few less O zone starts due to the young pairing, his possession numbers dropped quite significantly, and had worse CF% numbers than Cale Makar and Sam Girard. The power play was inept, as Barrie couldn’t get a shot through, as it was confirmation of his streakiness and also, how he often fails at the biggest moments against the better competition. He’s supposedly our no. 2 D man, and when no. 1 isn’t playing well, he cannot step up, and be the no. 1 guy. I had hoped to see Cale on the first PP, as it was failing, but Bednar could not make the switch, unfortunately, to replace Barrie with Makar.
I think it’s ludicrous to believe Barrie’d be worth 8 million a year, because his role would be reduced behind Makar, for sure, and perhaps others. To have him as the second or 3rd pairing and expect some good defense out of him is just not happening, and his still weak defensive play is not the best thing going forward for the Avs. He simply cannot be expected to reduce his O zone starts, increase D zone, and expect him to maintain or increase his possession numbers. Also, he would take up one more spot in the upcoming expansion draft, so in that respect, subtraction would be a gain for the overall picture.
While we may lose a bit of offense, personally, I doubt it, because Makar can take up the slack, and likely be better than Barrie offensively, with Sam and hopefully Timmins coming in for support on the PP and defensive depth. 8 million for less than your first pairing D man on a team with great young improving defensive talent makes no sense, especially when a weakness is secondary scoring, of which might be obtained in a deal for Barrie’s current high value. It was great he had a good season and didn’t devalue himself, so there should be a number of teams looking at him.
The fact Cale Makar was able to make a few starts and show how good he is was the definitive stamp to give him the opportunity to be our no. 1 PP point and D man, and also allow Sam and Timmins as puck movers to step up in place of Barrie. Cole, EJ and even Nemeth are better fits to play with the young blue liners. Barrie’s best value, for so many reasons, is in trade.
NoMoreRats
I think I appreciate Barrie more than many fans and I fear the effects of him leaving on the dressing room as it’s pretty widely known what good friends he and MacK are but you make a very persuasive argument.