No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

What the Erik Karlsson trade means for Colorado

AJ Haefele
AJ Haefele
September 13, 2018
What the Erik Karlsson trade means for Colorado

Author

AJ Haefele avatar
AJ Haefele

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (4 conversations)

Bgravel

Bgravel

September 13, 2018

Kakko is perfect too ????

Cdstukey

Cdstukey

September 13, 2018

Historically, how often has the worst ten actually received the number one pick in the lottery? Regardless, Colorado’s chances for a top five pick just greatly increased.

Cdstukey Replying to Cdstukey
Cdstukey

Cdstukey

September 13, 2018

*worst team

Cdstukey Replying to Cdstukey
JDC15

JDC15

September 14, 2018

11 times since 1995 has the team w/the worst record ended up w/the 1st pick. The current rules in place since 2016 draft have the 1st three picks drawn for, with the worst team having an 18.5% chance of winning 2nd worst 13.5%, 3rd worst 11.5%, 4th 9.5% then roughlly 1% lower each spot. After the ‘lottery’ for the 1st 3 picks teams are slotted by their record, hence in 2017 3 teams below the Avs ‘won’ the lottery dropping them to 4th. So the worst team has an 18.5% chance at #1, an 18.6-21.4% chance at #2, 21.2%-24.7% chance at #3.

MaxPrime867

MaxPrime867

September 13, 2018

I get the whole quantity over quality argument (though I mostly disagree with it) – but this just seems like a bunch of mediocre pieces.
I’d hate to be a Sens fan..

the best piece of this puzzle is inherently the conditional first round pick – which could be a 25-30th overall..
I don’t know much about the other prospects they picked up, but Rudolf Balcers seems like the only wild card with a high ceiling (but all potential and all potential)..

Joe is making the Duchene trade looking like the trade of the millennium..

Go Avs!

osmodiarshazbot

osmodiarshazbot

September 13, 2018

Do you think this is a go for it year for Thornton? It’s a lot to give up for a one year rental but not if this puts them over the hump. What is the realistic possibility of the sharks resigning EK and committing at least 20 million to two defenders going into their 30’s?

osmodiarshazbot Replying to osmodiarshazbot
Jon

Jon

September 14, 2018

It’s a go for it year for the San Jose Sharks. They’ve never won a cup, it’s not a do it for Ray Bourque thing when they’ve never won it. They have a mostly aging roster and their window closes every year they don’t win, especially after being so close a couple years ago.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article