No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Val Nichushkin’s Suspension Raises Questions About Future with Avalanche

Meghan Angley
Meghan Angley
May 19, 2024
Val Nichushkin’s Suspension Raises Questions About Future with Avalanche
May 11, 2024; Denver, Colorado, USA; Colorado Avalanche right wing Valeri Nichushkin (13) skates for the puck in the second period against the Dallas Stars in game three of the second round of the 2024 Stanley Cup Playoffs at Ball Arena. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports

Author

Meghan Angley avatar
Meghan Angley

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

1 Comment

Slops

Slops

May 20, 2024

So many of the details of this story are unknown, and really they’re none of our business. That makes just talking about it precarious; I cannot imagine all the pitfalls one faces trying to find people to talk to, gathering info, and reporting like this. Much respect.

Setting aside Val’s health and the damage that has been done to his relationships in the organization, since there’s nothing an outsider like myself can say, what interests me is what the team could do going forward. Since no other players have ever been in stage 3, as far as I know, there are no easy comparisons. The closest things to precedents are probably Corey Perry, Mike Richards, and maybe Evander Kane.

Details with the worm aren’t public, but there was an incident in which he was probably drunk and did something inappropriate or worse. The result was that his team terminated his contract, and he opted not to challenge the termination despite possibly having the legal ground to do so.

Mike Richards was old and no longer worth his cap hit, so the Kings were all too happy to terminate his contract when he got caught with opioids (I think) while crossing the border into Canada. He did contest the termination. The case was set to go to arbitration which would have been all or nothing, and the two parties settled just before that could happen. The Kings were rid of the contract but carried a small cap penalty for the remainder of the original contract’s term.

Finally Evander Kane crossed the border in a way that violated COVID restrictions. Similarly to the Richards case, the Sharks were eager to be rid of Kane’s contract. Kane contested and eventually settled with San Jose for roughly the difference in salary between his contract with the Sharks and his contract with his new team. Since they had room under the salary cap in the relevant time frame, the penalty was “applied retroactively” and it had no real implications outside of the money.

So where does that leave the Avs? Based on the language quoted to describe the Player Assistance Program’s phase 2, Val will “become eligible” for reinstatement in mid November. Based on that phrasing one might surmise that there are conditions he would have to meet, such as staying clean, fulfilling the program’s treatment plan, and possibly passing some kind of review administered by the program, the team, the league, an arbitrator, or some combination thereof. Not comparable situations, but it has been reported that Joel Quenneville could only be hired by a team if that team applies to the league and Gary Bettman “reinstates” him, so there is some context for how reinstatement might be defined.

All of that possibly gives the Avs an out, if they decide that they can’t move forward with Val on the roster. One that the Kings/Sharks did not have, in that it wouldn’t be a contract termination, but rather a lack of reinstatement if Val doesn’t qualify.

So from the perspective of the front office, the crux of the matter is whether or not they will have agency in regards to reinstatement. If they will have the opportunity to decline to reinstate him regardless of any outcome in treatment, then they could choose to move on and allocate his cap elsewhere. If they won’t have a say, and reinstatement means that whenever Val clears he’s back on the cap sheet regardless of their desire, they’re kinda handcuffed cap wise.

An obvious example of how the former scenario might manifest: the Avs know Val’s cap hit is gone, they sign Drouin to a contract, cheap players like Malinski and Annunen fill out the empty roster spots, and Landeskog (if healthy) is on the opening night roster.

If the Avs aren’t free to use Val’s cap space, they probably keep a decent chunk open while they wait for the process to resolve. Wouldn’t necessarily have to be his full 6 and an 8th million, but close enough that they could bridge the difference with some easier transactions. Would be unwise to put themselves in the position to require another team’s help to move significant money mid season, on short notice. The other team(s) would have all the leverage and could extract much value.

Complicating matters even further, the Avs could still want Val, in which case they’d probably be keeping cap free in anticipation of his return. Seems unlikely, but the league could also theoretically give some kind of dispensation to temporarily waive cap hit if Val were to be reinstated, but the Avs didn’t want to have him on the team.

Given the sensitive nature of this whole process, and how tight lipped the Avs are in general, it wouldn’t surprise me if the state of the opening night roster will be the first real indication we get in how the team expects this process to play out.

I’m noodling this all out as I write, and I’m absolutely not an expert in any of this stuff, so many grains of salt are recommended. It’s just what seems logical/plausible to me.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article