On this episode of the BSN Avalanche Podcast AJ Haefele and Jesse Montano break down the Avs’ draft rounds 2-7. They also take a look at news from around the NHL.
If an account exists for that email or username, we just sent password reset instructions. The link is good for 24 hours.
You can sign in below with your new password. Redirecting in a moment…
No results found for ""
Type at least 3 characters to search
Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!
On this episode of the BSN Avalanche Podcast AJ Haefele and Jesse Montano break down the Avs’ draft rounds 2-7. They also take a look at news from around the NHL.


Scroll for next episode
0 Comments (3 conversations)
K.Szela93
I’m a little disappointed with the Avs draft, and I know it’s early and nothing is even close to being final but I can’t help but shake the feeling that they passed on some real talent. A lot of these players seem like gambles or even unknowns. I hope Avs management proves me wrong and gets this right. They have so much talent in some of their prospects I want to keep this momentum moving forward and surround our current team with skillful youth.
TexAvs
Sampo Ranta is the key to if you like or disliked this draft.
The way I see it is people look at the NHL Draft like the NFL Draft.
Unlike the NFL Draft finding NHL players after round 2 is very hard.
Basically anything after round 2 in the NHL Draft is a gamble and if you gamble why not gamble big.
Avs could’ve taking a safer bet than Annunen or Ranta but is gambling on safer bet that has the potential of bottom 6 foward or bottom 2 defenseman better than a riskier bet that has the potential of starting goalie and top 6 foward?
HansBrix
“I can’t help but shake the feeling that they passed on some real talent…”
Out of curiosity, who would you have wanted them to choose instead, and why?
The thing is, unless you’re in a position to select with one of the top few picks, it’s nearly impossible to draft based upon “reality”. Even with the top picks in each draft, and ignoring the generational players that come and go, you are drafting on behalf of player X’s ‘potential’ for your team’s needs. Whether those needs are immediate or distant will also play a part in the decision. Any player that you feel displayed “real talent” in previous and current levels of play, may not be able to translate that into the NHL. Look at the two first round busts that did not receive QO yesterday… a former number 1 and a former number 11.
With that being said, just because your team did not choose a player with the names on ‘your list’ (the names that you heard of so frequently – over the past days, weeks, months – and watched highlight reel offensive-stats-videos on) doesn’t mean that the draft will be a bust. What a situation like this tells me is that your team understands how to gamble. From what I have been able to observe, it seems that they have not only learned from previous mistakes that delayed them from finding an identity, but they seem to have officially established that said-identity, and are working on ways to preserve, strengthen and protect it. It’s not always about trying to find that hidden gem or pulling in the player with the most offensive-talent, it’s about finding those characters that have shown that they can adapt their skillset to the next level. If those characters you find display a skillset that meshes well with your identity, their potential is worth the gamble in my book.
Jwpepper
Well put. It’s difficult enough for NHL teams with dedicated scouting staffs to consistently identify which players have “real talent,” so it’s hard for me to put all that much stock into the various rankings, mocks, and media favorites you see going into any draft (not that I don’t voraciously consume this stuff anyway). So outside of the first two, maybe three rounds, I feel like the only viable way to immediately judge a team’s draft performance is to base the evaluation on the front office’s approach, not on the haul itself. Among the encouraging things to me about this year’s draft were that the Avs seemed to be well aware of their needs (e.g., scoring wingers and goalies), tried to leverage their apparent advantages (re: Russian players or having a Finnish goalie coach), and didn’t blatantly reach for anyone. Outside of that, it’ll really be at least 2-3 years before we can start making decent judgments on the true value and talent of the guys who got picked in rounds 3-7.
TexAvs
Not AJ but I’m pretty sure he wanted Avs to draft Allan McShane instead of Sampo Ranta. In the draft podcast he talked about drafting him in the 2nd round.
HansBrix
That’s my apology, it was supposed to be a reply to @K.Szela93.