No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Kerfoot thrives in Duchene’s old spot in overtime loss to Senators

Jesse Montano
Jesse Montano
November 11, 2017
Kerfoot thrives in Duchene’s old spot in overtime loss to Senators

Author

Jesse Montano avatar
Jesse Montano

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (4 conversations)

Nels

Nels

November 11, 2017

Um, is it just me or does Kerfoot have more points and goals right now than our previous #2 center?

Nels Replying to Nels

November 11, 2017

i can’t believe he’s playing rocco over either one of them. i like rocco, but he’s an ahl player.

Nels Replying to Nels
Mark T

Mark T

November 11, 2017

I think with Soderberg out he needed Bourque for the PK. That in my mind is the justification for Bourque over AJ.

AceODale

AceODale

November 11, 2017

Jesse, thanks for making the sacrifice and going all the way to Sweden just to keep us updated on the Avs.

Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

November 11, 2017

I don’t want to be negative, and I am not ignoring the positives from this first game w/o Duchene, but if I’m honest I experienced no small amount of frustration watching this one. Still far too many bad decisions, ill-advised pass attempts (resulting in loss of possession), and just poor overall execution in the offensive zone. Add to that a pretty shoddy OT effort, and that’s not the way you win games, folks. Glad we tallied a point. At some point these continued gaffes must trace their way back to coaching. I realize that no team plays mistake-free hockey, of course, but the excellent ones do not commit such errors constantly. We do. Let’s hope that the second game in Sweden is a marked upgrade in quality from the first.

Mark T

Mark T

November 11, 2017

The Avs deserved to lose that one. Far too many giveaways and missed defensive assignments. The OT goal was also 100% Landeskog’s fault as he was covering literally no one when his guy, Stone, scored a wide-open goal.

Also, Tyson Barrie continues to cement my opinion of him with his complete lack of ability to handle opposing players in front of the net. Sam Gerard already looks better defensively than Barrie. It’s my hope that he gets moved to forward. Failing that, I want him traded because despite all the points he puts up, he seems to cost us just as many, and for a defenseman that’s completely unacceptable.

Mark T Replying to Mark T
JDC15

JDC15

November 11, 2017

Good post until you wanted to move Barrie to forward.

JDC15 Replying to JDC15
Mark T

Mark T

November 11, 2017

Why shouldn’t he be moved to forward? He can still play the point on the powerplay. I think his skillset is perfectly suited to playing forward.

Mark T Replying to Mark T
JDC15

JDC15

November 11, 2017

Oh I don’t know because he has spent his entire career at a defenseman, or that he is 2nd pairing defenseman, or that playing forward is completely different than playing defense, or that you don’t have forwards qb power plays because of ice time. And contrary to your opinion you don’t give a guy who is horrible a $5M dman contract. It’s the type of comment back in the day you’d here from uniformed fans about Ozolinish. Joining the offense from the d spot is a distinct skill when to pinch or sneak down in the slot, as compared to forward playing off the half boards, behind the goals, living in the slot in front of the crease. The numbers he creates from d wouldn’t translate pt for pt to forward. Look at a scoring chart for where his points come from, 80% from face off dots and out. Compare that to a forward who is usually 80% inside and below the face off dots. It’s asinine to here fans say move defenseman to forward. Name me ONE NHL defenseman that has done it. Outside of Sergei Federov, who was a hall of Famer, and arguably the best skater ever, I’ve never seen a forward move back to defense. Sure some forwards are on the point on the power play Joe Sakic a home town advantage, but he didn’t qb the power play because he played with a Dmen like Ozo, Blake, and Bourque. But it is a complete different skill set and it doesn’t happen for a reason. Another thing. You want to create ANOTHER hole on the defense, to move Barrie to forward, where is he going to play. Not on the 1st line, who is he going to replace on the 2nd line? Then your going to what put him on the third line the 4th line? What so he can get 10-12 minutes a game instead of 20-22? Then playing out of position in a third less time, what is his point production going to do, go up?????

Yeah it is a stupid, dumb, uninformed opinion.

JDC15 Replying to JDC15
Chris DeMott

Chris DeMott

November 11, 2017

Brent Burns

Mark T Replying to Mark T
JDC15

JDC15

November 11, 2017

Greer seems to think the way he is going to stick in the NHL is to be an agitator. He’s better than that and he needs to play smarter.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article