No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Just my take: It’s time for the Colorado Avalanche to trade Gabriel Landeskog

John Reidy
John Reidy
December 11, 2015
Just my take: It’s time for the Colorado Avalanche to trade Gabriel Landeskog

Author

John Reidy avatar
John Reidy

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (6 conversations)

Skyg

Skyg

December 11, 2015

A “defensive offensemen” huh?

A defensive …forward?

Clickbait. Go back to covering the nuggets.

Busted Twigg

Busted Twigg

December 11, 2015

BSN Denver – Can you keep this ass-clown off the Avs site? It’s like he crapped on a lot of really nice material and now it needs to be taken out and cleaned. The BSN Avalanche site is building a good reputation. Don’t let this click-bait artist ruin it.

Busted Twigg Replying to Busted Twigg

December 13, 2015

He makes me think of Kiz from the Denver Post.

Replying to

December 14, 2015

He’s a failed clone of Kiz. Got all the brains of Kiz, but lacks the talent.

Replying to

December 14, 2015

No, please. Don’t cover anyone.

December 11, 2015

Based on Twitter, there’s 20 answers and the consensus is that you don’t trade Landeskog. Sorry dude.

The thing with a rebuild is that it takes years to complete, it’s a slow process, but because we’re an instant gratification kind of society/fanbase/city/whatever, we expect success now instead of letting these guys come into their own.

The problem is not that Landeskog is struggling (um, okay? I mean, bad penalties aside …), the problem is that defense and goal tending have been the trouble areas this season, in addition to a coaching staff that has difficulty adjusting their play to the game as it happens, while the opposition is willing to and does make those adjustments.

To suggest that Landeskog is a bust with this team is completely misguided. He’s not a natural goal scorer, true, but he does score goals, can set up plays, and can use his size through the neutral zone and along the wall. With the fact that he was an injury scratch on Wednesday, I’d be more willing to believe that he’s been playing hurt, or if not that at least in some discomfort, for a bit.

Replying to

December 14, 2015

Well said Megan!

We have 4 players on this roster that the team has drafted. That alone points out just how much more rebuilding this team needs to do.

December 12, 2015

You’ve been a donks fan for 4 years and now you think you understand hockey? No. Just no.

hockeyhacker5

hockeyhacker5

December 13, 2015

> he’s also been fairly ineffective for a second overall pick
For his draft class (2011), he’s #2 in games played, and #1 in goals, points and penalty minutes. Does that mean everyone else is wholly ineffective? Landeskog has a higher points per game than the top two scorers from the 2012 class, and despite being a year younger, he has more career points than all but three scorers from the 2010 class, and his points per game is higher than one of those three. Moving to 2013, only one player in the top five selected has a better points per game, and that would be Landy’s teammate, Nathan MacKinnon. From the 2014 draft, nobody in the top dozen can match Landeskog’s points per game. What exactly are the standards in play here?

December 14, 2015

I gotta agree… Reidy is an idiot.

Why is it when a guy is quiet and not scoring on a 2pt/game basis people say we should trade him? Ok, so he’s quiet, and not scoring. Fine. If you’re argument is right, he’s not pulling his weight and the ONLY value he has is that he’s got a cap happy contract.

What would you expect to get for a guy like that in a trade? How would a forward that isn’t scoring help a team on a playoff run?

This site has got to get it’s head out of it’s rear end. The days of the Avs trading a couple 3rd line players for a rent-a-player future hall-of-famer for a playoff run are LONG gone. A guy like Blake, Bourque or Roy wont come to colorado now for the relatively low prices we were able to get them 15 years ago. And even if they could, the CAP wont allow it to happen.

Grow up, pretend you are intelligent and start thinking. Only an idiot would say ‘we should trade him’ without asking about what you would trade him FOR. There are thousands of options on what you COULD trade a player for. Sure, we could pretend we can trade him to Stamkos, or Ovechkin. Maybe we bundle him with Grigorenko and a stray cat and get ourselves Sidney Crosby. Why not?

grow up. you get the best value during a trade when a player is hot, not when they are cold. *IF* you trade, you trade when it improves your team, not to dump a player in a ‘slump’.

I wont even mention he’s a premier player on this team’s roster. If we had 3 more guys playing like Landy, we would probably be leading this division.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article