No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Joe Sakic is trapped in a no-win summer

Cole Hamilton
Cole Hamilton
June 12, 2017
Joe Sakic is trapped in a no-win summer

Author

Cole Hamilton avatar
Cole Hamilton

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (5 conversations)

June 12, 2017

I think Joe should keep seeking help in the front office and embrace the youth movement. Watching ROR, Duchene, etc grow up together was a pleasure in years past – hopefully they can learn from that experience and not repeat the ultimate outcome. Even if the Avs have another bad season, fans will enjoy watching a young team make mistakes more than middling older players.

June 12, 2017

I get the overall theme of the article, I just have two maybe slight disagreements with the thought process.

The easiest one is about Joe. I don’t know him personally, but he’s never struck as ego driven, so continually pushing this as an either/or, either he goes for the rebuild or he tries to save his job, is an empty narrative. The most played highlight of his entire career will always be that of the only captain not to lift the cup first, I think that’s a statement on where his general mindset is. He’s always trying to do the right thing. I think he just got caught in this thing. Lest not forget Greg Sherman. Bad. Because of him, I think Joe got tossed into GM a little faster than he wished probably before he was ready, and I think his greatest flaw was he never really had a middle/long term plan. Everything was reactionary to what was going on. I think it was easier for him to add veterans because what did the Avs do literally every trade deadline of Joes career? Add. What did they basically never do? Develop youth/sell. I think he’s going to continue to do what he feels is best for the Avs until he decides to leave, now whether we agree with it or not is completely different.

The second thing that bothers me is that why is hockey the only sport where everyone locks into a teams point total as the definitive end all/be all of how good a team is? There’s such a variance of outcomes in any given season and we witness only one “simulation” of potential outcomes. Other sports seem to understand this, yet hockey makes sweeping judgements based on that one run through. If they played the 2001 baseball season 1000 times, my Mariners would never win 116 games again. If they played the 2015-16 premier league season 1000 times, Leicester would never win the league again. Along with that, if we played the 2016-17 NHL season again, the Avs would be hard pressed to ever do worse than 48 points. But the NHL never sees it that way. They could toss the exact same team back on the ice next season and easily regress (yes, regression goes both ways) back toward an 80 point team and everyone would be blown away and wonder how they did it. The blue jackets are no clearer example of this. Every year that team is good, then bad, then good, then bad and every year they are labeled as a shocker!

Point is this, this summer isn’t that much gloom and doom. Are there changes to be made? Sure. If Sakic does have a job that needs saving could he do nothing and save it? By NHL standards, yes, yes he could. For me the biggest factor of the offseason is to just look for signs of a longer term plan. There’s been signs starting to sprout this last year, as I was pleased Joe kept kids in SA to develop after the NHL ship had long sank and everyone’s knee jerk reaction was “sell everything and play the kids!” Now I just want to see more of it. Add a few more picks, hell even if those picks are 2018 picks, cuts ties with some guys with no role past this next season, just get your house in order to have a solid base from which to work. That’d be a win.

June 13, 2017

I think last year was a perfect storm of bad things happening. No one thought it would be nearly as bad as it turned out to be. I think the Avs are a lot closer to contending for a playoff spot than this hyperbole piece makes it seem. Although if Beauchemin gets protected for the expansion draft, then Joe must go. Mostly because it would indicate that he’s not living in reality. I think the future could easily be as bright for the Avs as Toronto, Mackinnon took a huge leap last year in his play at both ends, despite the scoring numbers not bearing that out. Sakic also pivoted well, bringing in Andrighetto, Nieto, and the best move of all Barbario, who looked like a legit top 4 D. Last year reminded me a lot of Roy’s first year, but in reverse, where that season the Avs were incredibly lucky, last year they were incredibly unlucky. I watched every game, although I have to admit I had to turn them off sometimes, I know that there isn’t any reason to panic unless Sakic hasn’t learned from these experiences. The Avs have a lot of good young pieces coming up, hopefully Sakic and Bednar will play them and move Sodaberg, Colbourne, and Beauchemin down to the AHL where play like there’s belongs, or buy them out. As far as getting more picks last year, would you have traded picks for guys who looked as checked out as the vets on this team did? I doubt it.

mladen

mladen

June 13, 2017

Go young and will live with it. But if you go with the old, can’t play anymore, don’t care quitters then I’m gone.

xdikkx

xdikkx

June 14, 2017

Can we get a GoFundMe started to buy out Beauchemin?

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article