SAN JOSE, Calif. – Tyson Barrie was down, but he vows his Avalanche team is far from out.
“It’s gonna be a long series,” Barrie told BSN Denver, right after the Avs’ disappointing 5-2 loss to the San Jose Sharks in Game 1 Friday night here at loud, proud SAP Center.
I definitely don’t think the Avs are going to be swept out of this second round. They were the better team for the first half of this one, and they are faster overall.
BUT: This team has to find a way, someway, somehow, to put a little fear in these playoff-tested, veteran Sharks team. Because, let’s face it, the Sharks don’t fear the Avs, and why would they?
San Jose has beaten the Avs in all four meetings this season, counting among the first 82. They’ve beaten them in the last two playoff series meetings. They have home-ice advantage, and the Shark Tank continues to be an absolute haunted house to the Avs. The script that played out here in Game 1 was the same one we’ve all seen for about the last 15 years here continuously: A good start, a competitive game for the first half, then a bunch of costly mistakes that the Sharks immediately convert for goals, then basically the Sharks playing rope-a-dope the rest of the way for a somewhat comfortable win.
Somehow, some way, the Avs have to do to the Sharks what they did to another team that probably didn’t fear them much – the Calgary team that is now playing golf, thanks to the Avs. But how scared is bearded caveman Brent Burns going to be against Colorado’s collection of skillful but still somewhat small-ish forwards? Is Joe Thornton going to be scared by anything after a gazillion games for this team, most of which have ended in victory against the Avs?
Somehow, some way, the Avs have to get the Sharks to worry about them more. That only comes with victory. The Avs have to find a way to win Game 2 Sunday. Or, this might not be such a long series after all.
“We played really good those first 30 minutes, and then it got away from us in the second,” Barrie said. “We just couldn’t get it back. Give them credit, their goalie played well. They took it to us there at the end of the second and they had the momentum.”
This whole game swung on three things, all in that second period. First, the Avs – up 2-1 after Colin Wilson’s power-play goal – got a four-minute PP advantage after J.T. Compher was sticked in the mouth, drawing blood.
Cue the bad Sharks pun here: The Avs had blood in the water at this point, but acted like minnows instead of a hungry Great White. They couldn’t do much on the four minutes, the Sharks crowd came back to life, then the Avs started playing the role of the bumbling visitor.
Erik Johnson, in key sequence No. 2, had his shot blocked at the blue line by Marcus Sorensen. Down the ice he came on a 2-on-1 with Grizzly Adams, aka Thornton, and it was in the back of the net past Philipp Grubauer. Sequence No. 3 was an unfortunate one for Mikko Rantanen, who was turned inside out on a move by Kevin Labanc, who beat Grubauer up high. That was the game-winner.
Jared Bednar said he “could live with” the first two goals against, but what he couldn’t abide by was the last 10 minutes of that second.
“We lost too many races, we didn’t get our numbers to the puck,” Bednar said. “They started skating in the offensive zone, and we just weren’t committed enough to stay with it. The third period, we come out and start working again, but they’re sitting back a bit. The difference in the hockey game was that 10 minutes.”
The Sharks are getting older, but they still are one of the best cycling teams in the league in the offensive end. They are great at keeping possession down low and making plays at the net, or else making passes back to the point, where guys like Burns and Erik Karlsson fire shots on goal. Then, they go get the puck again, and the cycle starts all over. The Avs have to figure out a way to get pucks out of their zone better. That isn’t just the defense – it’s the forwards supporting the puck more. There were too many gaps between the forwards and defense in their zone, and again it burned them.
But there was enough good stuff in this one so that Avs fans shouldn’t get too down. A couple of bounces go their way when it was 2-1, like Carl Soderberg lifting a puck just a little more on a great chance, and it could have been an Avs runaway. Game 2 will be the litmus test as to whether this really is a team that can do more than steal one round, or one that just isn’t there yet in learning how to win against a really experienced team.
“I feel good about where we’re at. We’ll have to make some adjustments,” captain Gabe Landeskog told BSN Denver. “We’ve got to make sure that, when we have some lows, that we limit our mistakes. That’s what ended up costing us tonight. We took 10 minutes off at the end of the second.”
OTHER NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS
- It’ll be interesting to see if Bednar makes any lineup adjustments for Game 2. Especially, if he decides Sam Girard just isn’t the right type of defenseman to be playing against a team like the Sharks and goes with the bigger, more physical Patrik Nemeth, who was scratched. I tend to doubt he will – I don’t think he wants to hurt Girard’s confidence like that. Maybe he’ll play seven D in Game 2 and scratch a guy like Derick Brassard, who was ineffective in this one. The Avs will practice Saturday here, and we’ll know more then maybe.
- Alexander Kerfoot finished a minus-4. As I noted in the game grades, his spot on the top line, with MacKinnon and Landeskog, may be tenuous for Game 2.
- The Avs were assessed 15 official giveaways by the stat keepers, to seven for the Sharks.
- Brent Burns had a goal, three assists and was plus-4. Other than that…
- One of the things I’ve worried about from an Avs standpoint is: maybe this is one of those teams of destiny, the Sharks? After that miracle comeback win of theirs in Game 7 against Vegas, maybe this team just has some pixie dust all over them? Maybe this is just the year Joe Thornton finally gets his Cup, a la Ray Bourque or Alex Ovechkin? Stuff like that, that destiny stuff, can be a real tough thing to overcome.

0 Comments (12 conversations)
avsfan444
Is this team so fragile that, by not converting on a 4 min pwrplay, and then subsequently getting scored on, they lose so much morale that they take the rest of the period “off”? If so, how does one correct this issue?
Hockeyhead
Dater, you said it all! Good analysis. After that power outage on the 4 minute PP, you could see it coming, All it took was Johnson forcing a shot at the point, odd man rush and the puck is in the back of the net. The rest is history. Johnson should know better and just keep the cycle going or at least get the puck deep into the corner. The thing that I find troubling is that the Avs looked soft on the puck. Are the Avs just physically unable to compete for puck possession battles with the sharks or are the sharks in their heads and the Avs are not willing to pay the price to win puck battles? What say you AD? Also, the Avs need to stop giving the puck away when have possession. So hopefully next game we will see more fire and desire and a willingness to pay the price to possess the puck. Fewer turnovers, a harder forecheck, the sharks D needs to get hit and see the speed back in the Avs game.
earl08
Sharks played better than I expected along the boards, and as I suggested, forchecked the Avs to death. Avs D cannot slog it around the boards & hope to break out, especially Johnson who is a turnover machine using that method. The series will be won in the corners of the Avs D zone.
jpwheels
I had the same reaction to this game that I had to losing the first game last series;
the Avs were fine until they went MIA halfway through the second period. They left a W on the table.
DP10
A few things make me hopeful:
1) The Avs lost game 1 vs the Flames, and in general, they are one of the better come back teams in this league.
2) The Sharks are an aging team. Yeah, Thornton and Burns made their experience count tonight. But they kept Hertl pretty much in check who is the Sharks hottest player right now. Thornton especially, while he is a future hall of famer no doubt – it’s hard to imagine him elevating his game a lot more.
3) The Sharks are definitely a much more seasoned and physical club than the Flames, but I also think they are similar to the Predators, which the Avs started to figure quite nicely in the latter parts of the season. So while at first glance, the Sharks don’t seem like a great match up – especially with the record between them – I think the Avs stack up better than one might expect.
4) This Series can be a milestone for the Avs. Defeating the Sharks could lift the Avs’ Profile from perennials stand-ins to one of the power houses in the West, but they need to take that step. I think the Avs can rise to the challenge!
Colorado_Gary
Girard probably isn’t the right type of D-Man for this series if he has to play a regular shift. Maybe he was rusty, whatever it was – he wasn’t good and EJ stunk it up too. So you play 6 D and not 7, what ends up happening? The result was the Avs got in a hole and were only playing 8 or 9 forwards anyway as they tried to catch up. So why not play 11? Put Nemeth out there, much more physical than Girard (who I love BTW). If G doesn’t have to carry the load of a regular shift in a physical game, use him conditionally (PP Unit 2, etc.) I think Nemeth could have made a difference out there tonight. But the team didn’t have much fight. Time to turn the tables. Time to make Martin Jones turn back into Martin Jones. And every time EJ wimps out on the boards and coughs up the puck sit him for a while and let him think about it.
JDC15
AD great analysis, you hit on multiple points that were key. Yes at least for game 2 7d 11f and where ever possible get MacK on the ice against Thornton. Against the Soderberg and Jost lines the pace appeared significantly slower which seemed to really engage Jumbo.
Carter970
I was wondering if playing 7 D would further complicate line changes for Cale. It seems he (and the rest of the team) are struggling to figure it out with 6 D.
pixelrebirth
You say destiny, I feel like that is the case for the San Jose Sharks too. “For Pavelski, For Thornton” … Thornton took his A to a C last night like so many assistant captains cannot do—
The Sharks are feeling it and if the Avs lose game 2 — Im with you this is could be over before we got started.
Game 2 in SJ — that is a monster game for our confidence.
gtq
I thought Johnson shooting the puck into someone standing 3 feet from him was stupid and was the turning point. Up until then we had completely outplayed them. We have seen Johnson make a number of bad decisions this year and create 2 on 1s the other way. I also thought Grubauer was mediocre at best. I would also like to see Bednar resist the urge to play the Big 3 together too much. Thought he did it too much too early tonight. When we go with the one great line we got nothing else. I would not change the lineup. This is our best lineup; no reason to panic.
GWood
And there it is… You said the word that I didn’t want to utter out load. I’ve told my son, over and over, that I wanted to them to get their cup (during those years when the Avs were not in the playoffs) so that they would never be a ‘team of destiny’ when we finally got back in the hunt. Here we are. The boys need to dig deep. And come on EJ, you couldn’t see that play happening before it did? You have to make better decisions than that, you are a vet. That was the turning point in the game.
Justin
Why were Girard and Makar playing at the same time for at least one shift? NOT a good idea against the Sharks!
I’m not worried, I expected them to lose this one just as I expected them to lose game 1 last series. We don’t play well (relatively speaking) after long layoffs. And it’s not just us, the two teams that swept round 1 also lost. This was a long one too so I wouldn’t be surprised if we lose the next one too, but I still like our chances.
Can’t wait for game 4… I’ll be there!
David C McKinnis
I think they played together while Johnson was getting his skates repaired.
NoMoreRats
I thought the Avs intensity and puck movement on the double minor was about half of what it was on the previous PP. They still have to re-learn the same lesson about keeping the petal down. Frustrating but this another reason why it was a good idea to play Maksr now.