Of course, it was Ryan O’Reilly who made the winning difference in the Avalanche’s 3-2 shootout loss to the St. Louis Blues Monday night. Did any longtime Avs fan, who have seen a parade of ex-players torture them pretty much from Day 1 since the team moved to Denver in 1995, expect anything different?
O’Reilly scored the only goal in the shootout, while Nathan MacKinnon, Gabe Landeskog and…Sven Andrighetto?…all got feeble shot attempts on Jordan Binnington. So, while the Blues got the extra point in this one, this night finished much better overall than it seemed it would.
The Avs fought back from a 2-0 third-period deficit to tie the game with 47 seconds left in regulation, on an Alexander Kerfoot goal. That got them a point in this one, and that point might well make the difference in the end for the Avs in making the playoffs. Or, maybe it won’t.
As it stands, the Avs have three games remaining in the regular season, with a two-point lead on Arizona for the second and final wild-card spot in the Western Conference. Each team has three games remaining. The Avs play Edmonton (Tuesday night), Winnipeg and San Jose. The Coyotes play the L.A. Kings, Vegas and Winnipeg.
May the best team advance.
The Avs deserve tons of credit for getting this point. They looked dead as a doornail by the 16-second mark of the third, when Vladimir Tarasenko, as he always does, scored a goal to make it 2-0 for the Blues. The Avs were just atrocious in the first period, getting outshot 14-2 and outscored 1-0 (one Blues goal was called back).
But, after that, the Avs played competent road hockey, outshooting the Blues 10-3 in the second. Still, things looked hopeless with the clock ticking under 14 minutes in the third. Binnington, this year’s surprise NHL goalie who came out of nowhere, seemingly had the Avs in check.
But then came the two tips; First, Gabe Landeskog, on a tip of a Patrik Nemeth shot. Then, with under a minute left, a great tip by Kerfoot of Landeskog’s lead pass past Binnington. Tie game, point gained.
The overtime and shootout? Of course, it went against the Avs. But that’s how it almost always goes against the Avs this year.
Here’s the good news: No more five-minute overtimes or shootouts in the playoffs.
The Avs got one step closer to them Monday night.
OTHER TAKEAWAYS
– A week or so ago, I would have said Semyon Varlamov would play in a game like on Tuesday against Edmonton. But, at this point, I think Jared Bednar will just ride his hot goalie to the end, for better or worse. I think everyone will worry too much about rust with Varly at this point, to play him in such a big game. Philipp Grubauer has shown lately he can handle this kind of workload. It’s only about a 90-minute flight from St. Louis to Denver, so I expect the Avs will get in at a reasonable hour tonight and have all day to sleep and get ready for the Oilers. I think Gruby gets the start, but we’ll see.
– Why Bednar used Andrighetto in the third shot of the shootout, I have no idea. That was his first shootout attempt with the Avs EVER. He hadn’t attempted a shootout shot since the 2015-16 season, with Montreal. Here’s the thing: Andrighetto seemed to actually have Binnington beat on the backhand. All he had to do was lift the puck over Binnington’s outstretched pad and it would have been a goal. But Andrighetto slid the puck right into the pad.
– If he has to play hurt a little, I think the Avs have to ask that of Mikko Rantanen soon. The Avs have scraped by without him, but they really need his offensive talent in these last few huge games. It’s time to go for broke, not save up for a rainy day. The rainy day is here.

0 Comments (8 conversations)
jbame
Man, that Ghetto decision with the game, maybe playoffs/season all on the line was a really poor choice by Bednar.
NoMoreRats
Not sure which game you were watching AD but Kerfoot deflected a Landy shot from the blue line 🙂
NoMoreRats
Guess it was more the point than the blue line but it wasn’t a Soderberg lead pass.
https://www.nhl.com/avalanche/video/kerfoot-tips-in-tying-goal/t-277350912/c-67397903
Adrian Dater
AuthorWoops. I knew it was a Swede though
Colorado_Gary
Love Ghetto, but if the Avs miss the playoffs by a point or a tiebreaker, wow, just wow. Barrie? The Condor? Soda? Kerfie? Even Brassard? You go to a guy like Ghetto if you’re 7 or 8 shooters in.
Bob_W
Bednar has said 2 things about shootout player selection: 1. They practice shootouts and he uses the players who do best. 2. He consults with the goalies and they tell him which shooters are the most difficult to defend.
The St. Louis second goal was a result of a turnover by MacKinnon who then just watched as the goal scorer took a second shot on the rebound.
jpwheels
When I saw it was Ghetto who got the nod as the third guy in the shootout, I was surprised.
I didn’t really have an issue with it, but I did think Jost or Kerfoot would have gotten the nod instead.
That said, I think Ghetto has been playing pretty well lately. And maybe coach was rewarding him for that.
I’m happy the Avs got the point. But I’m really disappointed the team laid a total egg in the first period…that was damned poor effort.
DP10
So what is the tie breakers between Arizona and Colorado? If I recall correctly, head-to-head, both teams have a regulation time win with the Avs holding the advantage by virtue of MacKinnon’s shootout winner. So that would put Colorado ahead in the event of both teams ending up with equal points and equal number of ROW’s (both have 34), right?
I believe the Coyotes have the tie breaker in head to head: the avs wone in arizona and then lost in arizona but the first home game of the team with the higher number of home games is discounted. Thus yotes 2: Avs 0
Then the Avs won in Denver but the Yotes got an overtime point. Yotes 3: Avs 2 :/
That means the Avs need to gain in ROW because they are currently, as of tonight, tied with that. They can’t let it get to the head to head tie breaker
DP10
Now I had to double-checked the tiebreaker rules on ESPN. It seems the tiebreaker you describe only comes into play if both teams have earned equal number of points in all head-to-head games, which they haven’t as Colorado has a 1pt edge. So if were equal on points, it first goes to ROWs, then to points earned for all head-to-head results, then first game in Arizona is disregarded. ROW’s will be hard to win for Colorado because they are currently tied. Only if Arizona were to make up the 2pt gap by virtue of 2 OTLs or a shootout win, would the head-to-head comparison be triggered, which would seem to be in Colorado’s favor.
This is what NHL.com says, which is copied and pasted to the ESPN website:
The greater number of points earned in games between the tied clubs. If two clubs are tied, and have not played an equal number of home games against each other, points earned in the first game played in the city that had the extra game shall not be included. If more than two clubs are tied, the higher percentage of available points earned in games among those clubs, and not including any “odd” games, shall be used to determine the standing.
Its a little ambiguous. Where it says ‘If two clubs are tied, and have not played an equal number of home games against each other’, does this refer to tied in the standings or tied in head-to-head match-ups? Having read this, I think that I am right but like I say, it ambiguous… Can we have a third party arbitrator?
Currently they are tied on ROW so, providing that doesnt change and they finish with equal points in the standings, it will come down to head to head. Like I say, I believe the Yotes have this if it comes down to it and that cannot change
DP10
There is actually a discussion on reddit about it, but opinions seem to diverge just as much: https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comments/b773m8/coloradoarizona_tiebreaker_clarification/
…BSN crew to the rescue please!!
earl08
I’m in a high pressure results based job. Seeing the Avs come out flat was a result of two things: one, STL having a great game plan, as ROR alluded to on the broadcast, & two, a banged up squad that lost their mental edge for a moment. We like to think that pro athletes are robots, who, based on prior results, are expected to perform at the highest level every time. This is not human nature. I’m not sure how motivational Bednar is, but this was definitely the type of game someone like Pat Burns or Pat Quinn would have made sure the team was Up for. Bednar has said multiple times, “we need self-motivated players.” This is BS; that’s a big part of the coach’s job. I do wish JB was a little more like Herb Brooks sometimes; show some fire & break from that stone persona once in a while. Maybe our next coach…
Joe Amaral
The puck bounced over Sven10s stick, he didn’t shoot it into Binnington’s pad, had that not happened I believe there was enough room for him to slide it in!