No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Bernier bounces back with brilliant performance in Avs’ victory

AJ Haefele
AJ Haefele
December 12, 2017
Bernier bounces back with brilliant performance in Avs’ victory

Author

AJ Haefele avatar
AJ Haefele

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (1 conversation)

Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

December 12, 2017

Regarding MacKinnon’s nullified goal (doesn’t that make two or three taken away from him this season?), at first I thought that the NHL had acted rightly. To my surprise, however, I am now less confident. I try not to be a homer (i.e. biased), but I can’t say I am sure I’m with the league on this one. But you may be able to straighten me out, AJ.

First of all, the ruling on the ice was a good goal, correct? If so, here is my question: In order for a ruling on the ice to be overturned, is the video evidence supposed to be conclusive? Or is that not a thing? If it is supposed to be definitive in order to reverse an on-ice call, then I disagree with MacKinnon’s goal being taken away. Keefe & Rycroft had an interesting exchange about it on Altitude, and I have to confess that the best video left me in doubt. I certainly cannot claim that it settled the matter, making it obvious and incontrovertible that the original ruling (on-side, good goal) was incorrect. It was extremely close. Keefe took one POV, and Rycroft leaned the other way. My point is that it was not crystal clear. Is it supposed to be in order to justify going against the way the refs saw it on the ice?

Av-a-dabba-doo Replying to Av-a-dabba-doo
Mark T

Mark T

December 12, 2017

I thought it was pretty clear that the puck never entered the zone before EJ entered. I didn’t watch the intermission show so I only saw the angles they showed during the broadcast and in those it looked very clearly like the puck never fully got past the blue paint.

In any case, I have to say that was an amazing play by Letang as it appeared to be exactly what he was trying to do.

Mark T Replying to Mark T
Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

December 12, 2017

I understand, and before seeing what was shown and enlarged during the intermission I felt as you did. Afterwards it became a bit more ambiguous. Even now, if you forced me to commit regarding what I believe actually happened on the play, I think I would agree with you — but, I’m not sure that is asking the right question. The question involves the criteria by which a play on the ice is to be overturned. If that criteria is to be “conclusive” in nature (much less “indisputable” – NFL), it did not meet that high standard (IMHO).

BTW, while I’m typing away … I know, of course, that this has nothing to do with the ruling last night, but is it not remarkable how many of these close calls have gone against the Avs this season? I’m trying to think of an exception. Video snake-bit!

Mark T Replying to Mark T
Eric Schlelein

Eric Schlelein

December 12, 2017

Yeah it was iffy that MacK was onside, but Johnson was WAY off side.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article