No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Avs-Stars Grades – Not a fun night

AJ Haefele
AJ Haefele
December 4, 2017
Avs-Stars Grades – Not a fun night

Author

AJ Haefele avatar
AJ Haefele

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (3 conversations)

December 4, 2017

Not a fun game to watch, and, yes, it brought back the nightmares of last season. How much of this is because of the absence of Landy?

Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

December 4, 2017

Solid grading, unfortunately. Don’t even want to quibble. I mean, even if a couple of the “F’s” were made “D’s”, does it really matter?

Just a thought: What about giving the coach a grade after each game? Here’s my case: I don’t see anything unfair about it, and it sometimes carries real importance concerning the game. Also, it would be another point of interest and discussion for your readers, and would further educate fans like me about the game of hockey (pregame personnel decisions, line changing, strategies, challenges, etc. — all that would go into the coach’s grading. Obviously it would NOT be an opportunity to just tee off on the coach after a frustrating loss. Hopefully it would be a fair evaluation of his role — nothing more, nothing less.

Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

December 4, 2017

Solid grading, unfortunately. Not going to quibble. I mean, even if a couple of the F’s were made D’s, does it really matter? Poor product put forth.

Idea to consider: What about giving the coach a grade after each game? Here’s my case for it: It’s a fair topic, and sometimes can have real bearing on a game. It would also make for an additional point of interest and discussion for readers of your ‘grades’ write-ups, would it not? Finally, it would provide an opportunity to further educate fans like me about the intricacies of hockey. Such items as pregame personnel decisions, line combinations and changes, defensive pairings, in-game adjustments, coach’s challenges, overall strategy and more — all that would go into the coach’s grading. Obviously it should NOT be used as an opportunity to just ‘tee off’ after a frustrating loss, but would aim to be a fair evaluation of the coaching performance pertaining to that particular game — nothing more, nothing less.

Just a thought. What do you think?

Av-a-dabba-doo Replying to Av-a-dabba-doo

December 4, 2017

I like the idea of giving a coach a grade. I think a lot of games I wouldn’t have too much to say about it. And it’s tough to grade a coach when pregame decisions (starting Bernier last night, for example) and in-game decisions (the decision to pull Bernier) might clash. How do I grade Bednar for last night when his pregame decision was bunk but his in-game decision was the correct one? I also liked that Bednar, in an attempt to kickstart some offense, was pairing Barrie with EJ and Girard in offensive zone faceoffs in the third period last night. That’s smart coaching. I like the idea of giving Bednar a grade. It would probably be the toughest grade to give out haha.

Replying to
Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

December 5, 2017

Appreciate the response. Sure, the coach’s evaluation would sometimes be a balancing act of factors, but the same can be said of the players. A recent example has been your comments on Mikko Rantanen: “disappears for long stretches of the game and his all-around effort is questionable” … next sentence … “Rantanen can flat shoot it, however”. Both statements true, yet you arrived at an overall grade. In the Bednar example you gave (Bernier instead of Varlamov), I don’t think both moves were of equal importance. My opinion is that not starting Varly was a much bigger minus than pulling Bernier was a plus, and thus I would give it more weight. So yes, a lot to factor in, but I’m confident you could do it. (We really do anyway, we just don’t post an official letter grade.)

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article