No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Avs-Predators Grades: Close but no cigar

AJ Haefele
AJ Haefele
March 17, 2018
Avs-Predators Grades: Close but no cigar

Author

AJ Haefele avatar
AJ Haefele

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (5 conversations)

JDC15

JDC15

March 17, 2018

Agree with the grades except Compfer, he was not good and his poor positioning led to issues multiple times. Dater hit on this on the podcast, kudos there, because I noticed him chasing the puck towards the boards leaving the slot open a number of times for a scorings opportunities for the Preds.

March 17, 2018

So when does the Siemens/Warsofsky experiment end? Lindholm/Johnson where are you???

Replying to
bjjones05

bjjones05

March 17, 2018

Hopefully this week. If we have 3 full D pairings in sync, we can make more noise. Just in time for the playoffs!!

WellHungMacK

WellHungMacK

March 17, 2018

I think you’re being a little harsh on Kerfy – he got promoted to the 2nd line after that “ugly” goal. He was dominant on the 4th line keeping possession in the Nashville zone. Yes, he kind of disappeared on that 2nd line and hasn’t produced in the capacity he should be right now, but I he is playing good hockey.

Love these though, keep up the good work and I’ll soon be a lifetime subscriber!

BHGodlyGovt

BHGodlyGovt

March 17, 2018

Varly’s grade is ok, but I would have gone with a B. He did not appear very exhausted, unlike many fans predicted that he would be, putting up the ludicrous notion that Martin should have played and not Varly. Only lost by 2 goals, instead of the 3-5 that we probably would have with Martin in net, and we can’t afford to have goal differential take such a large hit. Right move to start Varly tonight, imo. Didn’t think Varly could really be blamed for any of the three goals against. Not much he could have done to stop any of them. The first goal was just a great shot that had eyes, not like he could see the puck very well. The second goal was all on Zadorov, as he tried to be more of a forward (fighting for the puck with Forsberg) instead of being a defenseman (playing against Forsberg, making sure that he wouldn’t have been able to get to the puck). Finally, the third goal was just a quick, hard shot that he couldn’t have done anything about. I don’t know if I would call that “not good enough”, but more that luck just wasn’t on his side. All that being said, however, you have to rest him on Sunday. It isn’t necessary that he play against such a terrible team. Put Martin in instead.

Jose

Jose

March 17, 2018

I thought that, in general, we played well against a strong, experienced team. Hopefully we learned from the loss. As stated earlier it would have been nice to have a couple of our strong D back. In my opinion Zadorov should be graded a little higher despite his mistake. We don’t grade Barrie quite so harshly.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article