The Colorado Avalanche returned home from an impressive east coast road trip that saw them pot seven of eight possible points in the standings. That success has them spending their off day today sitting atop the NHL’s standings in a tie with Central Division foe Nashville.
At 3.67 goals per game, Colorado’s offense is tied with New Jersey for seventh-most prolific in the NHL so far and their 2.11 goals against per game are good for second in the league. Clearly, things are going very well for an Avalanche team trying to make the postseason for consecutive seasons for the first time since its general manager was its best player (Joe Sakic, in case you’re new here).
On the other side of the hockey world, and arguably in the center of it (if only in their own minds), the Toronto Maple Leafs started like gangbusters. Scoring at will and flexing their offensive muscle with regularity, Toronto lit the world on fire for about 10 days before the offense dried up.
While the Maple Leafs were trying to work the kinks out in their high-priced offensive attack, sitting on the other side of the planet was a player who had produced 122 points and 42 goals the last two seasons for them. 22-year-old William Nylander is currently hanging out in Europe seeking a resolution to his contract stalemate while the team holding the restricted free agent’s rights continues to play hardball and make public statements about taking less to keep a great group together.
Of course, the Nylanders (father Michael is advising William throughout this process) watched with the rest of the hockey world when Toronto signed free agent superstar John Tavares to a seven-year deal that will pay Tavares $11 million per season. It’s hard to cry poor when a team makes a significant splash like that, especially when its currently sitting on more than $13 million in cap space today.
That’s where the impasse has created a fascinating situation being monitored by all around the league. Nylander is reportedly asking for upwards of $8 million per year and Toronto, knowing they have Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner coming off their own entry-level contracts after this season, would prefer something in the range of $6 million per year. That’s a significant bridge to gap, obviously, and here we are.
As each day passes and Nylander gets closer to the December 1 deadline for RFAs to sign a contract or be ineligible to play this year, the pressure increases on both sides to find a deal here. While the threat of an offer sheet technically exists, the history of players signing them is extremely limited and them actually working even less so. As such, I’m going to skip that possibility entirely here because it just doesn’t happen.
But this all brings us back to Colorado.
The case for trading for Nylander
The top line just polished off devouring the east for lunch and has all three members in the top 10 of scoring leaders (Mikko Rantanen is currently tied with Matthews with 16 points for the league lead). The issue is Colorado’s secondary scoring, especially on the right wing where Colin Wilson is moonlighting as a top-six player despite a career suggesting he just isn’t that guy.
While Tyson Jost and Alexander Kerfoot are looking to prove their worth as second line players, the hole on the right side is glaringly obvious and Wilson’s three goals early in the year got them through a couple of games and provided hope the Avalanche could scrape by but just a handful of games later we’re back on earth where it’s obvious this isn’t a long-term solution.
Insert Nylander, the right wing with back-to-back 61 point seasons in his first two full NHL seasons. It’s a natural fit, right?
In a lot of ways, absolutely. He would immediately slot on to the right wing next to Jost (assuming he eventually works his way back up the lineup) and Kerfoot and bring a huge injection of skill and scoring punch to a line that obviously needs more. In terms of plug-and-play fit, there aren’t many situations better than Colorado for a player of Nylander’s caliber.
It’s the same case to be made for Colorado looking into acquiring Jeff Skinner and Mark Stone last summer. They clearly need more help in their top six. That’s just reality right now.
The danger of trading for Nylander
But the cost for acquiring Nylander isn’t just a willingness to pay him the money he desires. Let’s assume he really does want $8M per year and that number won’t change if a team trades for him. Colorado, like Toronto, absolutely has the cap room to get it done today. They’re sitting on more than $13M in salary cap space and have a projected $33M in cap space heading into next summer (assuming the salary cap remains exactly the same, which it never does).
That’s a ton of space but again, like Toronto, Colorado faces its own expensive contract situation come summer time. Rantanen’s ELC is finishing and he’s going to be due an enormous raise. Kerfoot, Nikita Zadorov, J.T. Compher and Sven Andrighetto are all players on expiring contracts. This season has yet to play out so we’re unsure the level of their raises but it’s fair to say the Avalanche won’t get away with paying that foursome the combined $4.8M they are right now.
Also, consider Semyon Varlamov is an unrestricted free agent at the end of the year and is currently performing like a top-five goaltender in his age-30 season. That’s a lot of work to be done just next summer for the Avalanche. Nylander’s $8M cuts into that significantly, even if the salary cap predictably goes up again.
They also have two first round picks in 2019 and there’s a possibility the Ottawa selection they own finds its way into the top five. Should that happen, Colorado will have another very high selection in a deep and talented forward draft class. They also, you know, used their 2018 first round pick on, you guessed it, a right wing!
Martin Kaut is just getting his career going in North America and scored his first pro goal over the weekend as a member of the Colorado Eagles. He’s a bright and instinctive two-way forward who certainly has the potential to fill that right wing on Colorado’s second line for a long time. He may never be the offensive player Nylander currently is but there’s a decent chance Kaut never asks to be paid $8M per season either.
To add further intrigue, next summer’s UFA class is currently slated to be particularly deep at…right wing. While it’s always a fool’s errand in trying to predict which players re-sign with their current clubs and which make it to the open market, the position is oddly deep already with Stone, Jordan Eberle, Mats Zuccarello, Wayne Simmonds, Jakob Silfverberg, and Joonas Donskoi, among others, on expiring contracts.
Rolling the dice in UFA is always a tricky proposition and not something I’m always a big advocate for but in this case it allows them the luxury of keeping their assets, letting their current players figure out more of who they are in the NHL, and seeing what happens with the Ottawa selection and Kaut with the Eagles. There’s a world in which the Avalanche will be just fine starting next season and acquiring Nylander ends up being a short-term jolt that costs them long-term flexibility.
Getting back to the UFAs, I can already hear someone yelling “BUT NYLANDER IS 22, AJ” and that person is absolutely correct, although maybe a little rude to use caps lock like that. It’s a great point and totally fair but signing a UFA only costs money. William Nylander will cost money AND trading a combination of players and draft picks to get him. Which brings us to…
The Tyson Barrie problem
This is the real crux of the conversation. We’re 1,300 words into a piece about trading for Nylander and haven’t even discussed what it might cost the Avalanche. I told you it was a fascinating topic! But now we’ve arrived at that particular junction.
Tyson Barrie has proven himself a very good NHL player. A flawed defender with an elite ability to generate offense from the blueline, Barrie is a star in his own right. He’s just 22 points shy of becoming the franchise’s leading scoring defenseman and it seems a large segment of Avalanche fans have spent the last couple of years ready to move on from Barrie. While fans are going to fan, we’ve reached the time in Barrie’s contract situation where the conversation has started to make a lot more sense.
Barrie is set to become an unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2020, just as the Seattle expansion draft is likely to take place. With Colorado’s current setup, they have three defensemen, not including Barrie, they badly will want to protect in Erik Johnson (whose contract may stipulate he must automatically be protected), Samuel Girard, and Nikita Zadorov. Barrie’s UFA status makes this a murky situation as Seattle could select him and negotiate a new contract in a special window setup for free agents taken in the expansion draft.
Or Colorado could choose to protect Barrie and expose one of those other three (very unlikely). Regardless, if Barrie makes it beyond next summer on the Avalanche roster, it’s going to be a very interesting situation to keep an eye on.
Part of the reason for that is, of course, Cale Makar, whose start to his sophomore year at UMass has included back-to-back Hockey East Player of the Week awards and an upset over top-ranked Ohio State. It’s fair to say Makar is one of the best defensive prospects not already in pro hockey and he will make any Barrie deal very easy for the Avalanche to stomach. Combining Makar and Girard’s upside, it’s a reasonable gamble they’ll be able to replicate, if not on their own than certainly in the aggregate, what Barrie produces for Colorado.
If the Avalanche chooses to keep Barrie, he’ll likely be quite a bit more expensive than the $5.5M he’s currently making, creating a whole different issue. But without getting into those dynamics, let’s ask an important question so many Avalanche fans seem to skip over: would Toronto even want Barrie?
With Morgan Rielly on the roster and already signed long-term, they have an offensive dynamo already and one of their top prospects right-handed puck-moving defenseman Timothy Liljegren. Those are two pretty good reasons for the Maple Leafs to view Barrie as an unnecessary piece in a Nylander deal, even if the entire hockey world can agree Toronto’s porous defense is most likely to be the culprit that keeps the Maple Leafs from a Stanley Cup run this year.
Barrie, while certainly an explosive offensive player, would not address what Toronto needs the most, which is defenders who excel in their own zone first but also possess the ability to transition to offense. Barrie simply isn’t that guy. If the Avalanche were looking to make that deal, I’d suggest Zadorov would be a better piece to build around than Barrie. Granted, dealing Zadorov would not solve all of Toronto’s issues and Colorado doesn’t have an easy replacement ready to go like it does for Barrie and it still doesn’t solve the Barrie problem. They’d do all of that and still have to figure out what to do with Barrie down the road.
If no Barrie or Zadorov, don’t even think about Makar as a trade piece. He’s off-limits. With Conor Timmins dealing with his injury issues, he’s also off-limits, though for all the wrong reasons and he wouldn’t be a high enough caliber prospect on his own to get the Nylander ball rolling anyway. Given Colorado’s roster is about to get significantly more expensive, all those ELCs on upcoming draft picks are going to be much more valuable than Colorado’s current wave of ELCs were during the rebuild so trading draft picks is also out.
Should Colorado suck it up and just trade for Nylander?
So there’s the dynamics of a Nylander deal for Colorado. It obviously makes plenty of sense right away. But looking at the long-term view, Nylander for whatever the trade would cost plus the high-end contract makes it just too much for my tastes. The Avalanche could obviously use the help this year but Colorado likely isn’t winning the Stanley Cup regardless of having Nylander or not so the Avalanche should still be focusing on the long game.
They’re set up wonderfully for a great future built around future stars. It’s always tough to preach patience when the organization is so close to a legitimate Stanley Cup contention window but a deal for Nylander is just not enough long-term payoff for what has to be given up. In my eyes, it’s not the year for that big move. I know some of you are going to roll your eyes and shout into the void “WHEN WILL BE THE YEAR” and I don’t have a good answer for you other than to send you a picture captioned “Soon”.
The Avalanche should resist one last mousetrap of temptation. Their time is clearly coming.

0 Comments (24 conversations)
Cgapter083
Good read as always!
Foppa21
Not saying they should do it now, but keeping the expansion draft in mind, would it make sense to trade Barrie for futures/prospects (i.e. something expansion draft exempt)? Or do you keep him around as expansion draft fodder?
Unit5
In conclusion, I 100% agree with your conclusion. Thanks for the thorough analysis that pretty much lays it all out.
Cerveau
Yup, an article full of brilliant thoughts, which in their brilliance keep us totally confused, except for the conclusion, which concludes… in the final analysis… don’t even bother thinking about it.
Cerveau
By the way, I really enjoyed the article too!
I enjoy all of AJ’s writing.
PK
Great article! Based on how Sakic has been the past few years I doubt we get Nylander(which I agree with your assessment). AJ have you been up the road to watch Kaut play yet? If so how is he looking so far?
LSVeitel56
Fantastic article, AJ. Thank you!
Skyler Thomson
Great read!! Fully agree. Keep up the great work!
gtq
Nicely written.
Avsolutely
Really great piece AJ. Agree 100%.
ThePhotoGorilla
Nylander is enticing, no doubt. And even if the salary demand is false, another issue to consider is the hold out. Sakic has a sharp eye on attitude and locker room environment – not sure a hold out fits in to that space. I think Barrie goes as early as the trade deadline IF Makar is signed after the college season. But that is probably too soon for Super Joe, unless the return is an exact fit. More likely, he is moved by Christmas 2019.
The Heretic
Okay, AJ, so let’s say throughout the month of November the top line stays on it’s current pace, the goaltending stays amazing, secondary scoring continues to struggle, and the boys keep racking up points. Does that consistent play right before the rfa cutoff change your mind?
In my mind a few things could change the conversation about the Avs this season. If Gruby shows up all season and francous (I’m not looking it up dude) tears it up then Varly is expendable no matter how great his play is. We could easily trade him at the deadline to solidify the defense and role into the playoffs with first and secondary scoring rolling (assume we made the trade here), a solid defense, and good goaltending.
My point, I guess, is while the trade could muddy up the money waters, there’s very real line of thinking that could convince Joe we could go for it. A savy GM could handle the money and draft while remaining very competitive for a number of years. It think winning a lot of our beginning road games could very well make Joe pull the trigger. We know we can rack up wins at home. If we kill it through the road heavy schedule in the beginning then we aren’t talking about a wildcard spot, we are talking possible home advantage for two rounds.
This just seems like a heart and brain battle. Brain says “woah, money”. Heart says “winning feels so good”. Heart is going to feel it even more with a successful November.
winchester4261
You’re probably right that the Avs should stay patient, but I for one think Nylander is underrated. This article on The Athletic by Ian Tulloch does a good job of breaking down how great Nylander has been the past two years. https://theathletic.com/600405/2018/10/20/is-william-nylander-undervalued-an-analytical-look-suggests-he-is/
mladen
I love the article and the conclusion. Other teams players are seldom as attractive as they look from afar.
Rich
Great article! In my opinion, Sakic pulls the plug and makes a deal for Nylander. The Avs finally have enough solid defensive prospects to back fill the void caused in trading Barrie. With that said my biggest concern, besides Barrie what else would Toronto want in return?
KCRybek
I know it’s not this simple but I’d rather pay $7mm for Nylander than $6mm for Barrie
picaro
Horrible article.
Just kidding. I just didn’t want to be another “Great read!” in a sea of many.
Oh well. Great read! I agree completely. Regardless of our final record, the Stanley window is still a little to the right of where the Avs are in their development. Even if Nylander lowers his asking price, the negotiations with TOR (even if you think TOR is being unreasonable) strike me as a little redolent of the situation with O’Reilly a few years back. Nylander is not necessarily unreasonable in his demands, but his demands are big, and that could bring some off-ice baggage (financial and personal) the team would have to contend with, on top of all the other dynamics and issues on the horizon, as you point out.
Sean.kells
Great read. Thanks AJ
JustinErickson
The saga of Toronto. I believe people might be looking at this at the wrong angle a bit. Dubas has already made big statements in public and I’m sure even more behind closed doors about keeping Nylander with no room for excuses. He didn’t say “We’ll do whatever we can..”. He said “We want to keep the three with Tavares and we will.” No question he had to sound even more confident about that to convince Tavares. So I don’t think he’s looking to trade Nylander. To fail at that promise would look too bad to Toronto media and to the locker room. I think he’s looking for decent young prospects that will play well with the quartet of stars or can shore up defense and he’s looking at teams that can take any expensive contracts off of his hands. The most important thing he’s looking for is the latter. And my guess is that he’s looking at other teams to see what teams could take Kadri with one of the expensive guys coming off their elc’s next year not named Tavares, Marner, nylander, or Matthews. I may have some of those details wrong but my guess is that Dubas isn’t looking for a Nylander trade because his integrity and credibility are on the line.
winchester4261
I agree that this is a critical move for Dubas in his young tenure as GM. Seems like a trade wouldn’t be ideal because of what he has said publicly, but there also seems to be a lot of ego/assumptions in what he and Shanahan have said about signing them all. Nylander has the unfortunate luck to be the first of the big three to sign and should be worried that both Matthews and Marner get a lot more pay than he does. I understand Nylander’s position and it clearly is right to demand top dollar…of course value is in the eye of the beholder.
As for Kadri…his contract seems pretty good to me…cheaper than Carl…. They should get rid of Marleau before Kadri, but might be hard to find a taker.
JustinErickson
Ya I don’t blame nylander at all. He’s gotta feel like the odd one out and the one asked to “take one for the team”. It’s not his fault dubas thought he could do it all.
Chris DeMott
Nice take, well said.
likeAbeast
Excellent read! Big concern (for me) with Nylander is either last year or the year before Friedman said in “31 thoughts” he was hearing from a few people Nylander was reminding them of Alex Kovalev and not in a good way… This team has a good thing going, player and (seemingly) locker room wise why not be patient and see this summer with the guys you mentioned (Stone, Eberle, etc.)?
HodgPodge
Great article. I 100% agree with most of it. But we do need to improve the second line somehow. Packaging Jost and Timmins could make for a great return without hurting our depth too much
Sports_Guy89
Loved the article!
Avs425
Very good Sir!
KCRybek
You jinxed it AJ. Sounds like 6×7 for Nylander
jpwheels
I usually don’t fry too many of the few remaining brain cells I have going this deep on these kind of things.
Getting too deeply into it has always taken away some of the fun of simply watching the team play.
But your piece is very informative and laid out nicely…excellent job AJ!
The Avs needs additional, consistent scoring help. I think everyone sees that.
And it looks like there are guys in the system that should help out with that, in time.
But I think there’s a fair bit of risk in that.
We don’t know how many (if any) of the young guys coming up will actually turn out to be as good as the team needs when the team needs them. It could be that any of the young guys take a couple of years before they’re rounding into shape as productive players.
So I’d like to see Joe get a young guy that has a track record now…but just be careful on the cost.
I don’t know if Nylander is that guy, from a cost standpoint.
faydout
I don’t think the cost of Nylander is worth the benefit of having him when there are other options either in our system already, or one we could potentially land this summer. Especially if it looks like we’re going to be on the verge of being competitive and making deep post season runs (easier to convince a UFA that your team is THE team to sign with).