No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Analyzing which players are being over and underrated in the NHL Draft

AJ Haefele
AJ Haefele
June 3, 2019
Analyzing which players are being over and underrated in the NHL Draft

Author

AJ Haefele avatar
AJ Haefele

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (5 conversations)

Avalangelist

Avalangelist

June 3, 2019

My dream would be to get either Byram or Turcotte at 4 and then be able to snag Podkolzin at 16

Avalangelist Replying to Avalangelist

June 3, 2019

Pod dropping that far would be interesting. I just think he’s too good for that far a fall.

Replying to
Audioveins

Audioveins

June 3, 2019

Stranger things have happened. See Timmins, Connor.

Audioveins Replying to Audioveins

June 3, 2019

I still can’t believe Pierre-Olivier Joseph went before Timmins.

NoMoreRats

NoMoreRats

June 3, 2019

More great stuff, funny putting Zegras in both categories. It’s going to be so interesting to see what we get at 4 and 16 and how they balance the two spots out. I can’t help thinking someone surprising will fall to 16 and the Avs will take him because they can afford to take a chance. As talented as Byram is I have to think Chicago will take a forward after going Jokijarju/Mitchell – Boqvist/Beaudin at the top of the last two drafts. BPA is one thing but they’re going to need to replace some forwards fairly soon. It just makes too much sense for them to take Turcotte. I hope the Avs take Byram if that happens.

NoMoreRats Replying to NoMoreRats
Poohrash

Poohrash

June 5, 2019

I’ve been totally wooed by the Podkolzin highlights and other info out there for a while now and still have him as a legit top 5 talent. Sure he was not phenomenal in U18 but he was ok and that was a small sample to make him drop a dozen places. A month and change ago I was worried that he’d not be on the board at 4.

Sunfunbun

Sunfunbun

June 4, 2019

It’ll be interesting to see if you are right, in the future, on Caufield . Caufield has been touted with an elite shot, and favorably compared to Alex DeBrincat, if not even even a better goal scorer. Imagine if he is a 40 goal scorer. That’s a level of scoring from a wing that would add great depth to the Avs. I have no trouble believing Caufield is good enough to score a huge bunch in the NHL.

I understand the thinking of not taking him early, but if a team is looking for one thing as an elite skill, the best scorer in this draft is Caufield. I’ve seen many players who are playmaker types and do not put the biscuit in the basket on the Avalanche over the years, other than the top line, to not covet an elite scorer, and while I believe no. 4 is a bit high for Cole, I’d agree with the Athletic’s Corey Pronman putting him at 5 overall in his ranking, and I think he’d be a great fit on the Avs, if they have the cojones to try and get the draft’s top goal scorer, a specific need for us, and the highest single quality, Caufield’s elite shot, in the draft beyond Hughes or Kakko.

You can say he didn’t create, or you could also say, he’s expert at finding all the soft spots on the ice, a supreme team player who’s role on a USNTDP laden with centers, was met with brilliance. If he was required to create more, perhaps he could have. He’s highly skilled and may be a better playmaker than it seems. US hockey didn’t need him to over reach with all the centers on the team, so it might not be a negative, as he’s a great team guy, and there is more in the tank on the NHL level, as he develops. Watching the U18’s, I thought often he was the best player on the ice, with all the top guys on the ice. I know his shot is elite specific, and I’m obviously fine with that, but I’m also not sure he’s completely one dimensional, as he’s a tough kid with thick wheels, and could be a scoring Martin St. Louis type as he develops.

Sunfunbun Replying to Sunfunbun

June 4, 2019

He’ll have an opportunity in college to really create more and show off his all-around offensive skills a lot more. And that’s my question with him really. He’s not the only good goal scorer in this draft but of all the guys being talked about in the top 15 or so, he’s the one with the least developed game beyond just that. He’s going to be a fun prospect to watch as he develops. The DeBrincat comparison is easy, obviously, but there’s five busts for every success story of these guys under 5’10” along the way so it’s not like this is a kid without significant risk attached to him. 5’7″ is REALLY small for a league as physical as the NHL The reason we can think of DeBrincat and Martin St. Louis off the top of our heads is because there are only a small (haha) number of them that have succeeded.

ThePhotoGorilla

ThePhotoGorilla

June 5, 2019

Totally agree on Podkolzin – I think it’s a mistake to let him drop too far, and the fact that everyone is “scared” of his contract seems overblown to me too. I’d be surprised if anyone taken between 3-10 make it onto rosters this fall, so the contract issue, isn’t (to me). And Podkolzin seems to have the potential to be just as talented, (and maybe more so), than either Hughes or Kaako. I’d have no problems if the Avs took him at 3, since I doubt he’d fall to 16. I also love this little exchange between him and the Caps when asked about the most unusual question he faced at the combine:

“Washington asked if I know how to sing,” he said via a translator.
“I said if they draft me I’ll sing to them,” he said.

ThePhotoGorilla Replying to ThePhotoGorilla
Poohrash

Poohrash

June 7, 2019

He’s amazing. I still want him at 4. Also has the benefit of further reinforcing COL as an organisation that is not afraid to double down on its Russian contingent. How does that look to Panarin when free agency arrives a week later?

ColinRennie902

ColinRennie902

June 6, 2019

Just an FYI – on the 2019 Draft Central page this story’s link is titled “Analyzing with …” not “Analyzing which…”. Sorry to be pedantic!

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article