No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Avs-Sabres Grades – Embarrassment

AJ Haefele
AJ Haefele
December 6, 2017
Avs-Sabres Grades – Embarrassment

Author

AJ Haefele avatar
AJ Haefele

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (5 conversations)

Sunfunbun

Sunfunbun

December 6, 2017

That’s just a crazy grade on Girard. The off side play wasn’t great, but he tried to slip the puck to MacK, and it went by him toward the blue line. It wasn’t a brutal turnover, there were two Sabre players on him at the half boards, and he tried to nudge the puck to MacK. The sequence following the offside was poor defense by the Avs, and to me, much worse play than the turnover. Larson turns with the puck and there are 3 Avs, Barrie, MacK and Grimaldi, on him. 3 on 1! He gets the puck to Puliot in the slot who has turn away from Girard, and Barrie whiffs on the poke check and lets Puliot skate by, free to pass to McCabe, who throws a seeing eye shot on net, that goes in. The non communication by the Avs and poor fire drill defense contributed heavily to a long shot, fairly lucky goal. It wasn’t a direct turnover, with no pressure, that led to an easy shot on goal, like the Nieto turnover, earlier in the game.

Girard made some nice plays, including a nice circle behind the net and feeding Barrie on a shot, and setting up other scoring chances. There was that nifty play in the 3rd, where he is near the blue line on the face off, and does his reverse move, which put the sabre player trying to defend him slipping into the boards. Girard then got the puck to the left side of the goalie for a nice chance for the Avs. If the Avs convert 3 of Girard’s nice passes, you’d be giving him an A. Overall, it was probably a C game for him, but he still looked really good skating out there, and in no way deserved an F grade, with plus corsi on the night and relative possession numbers decent.

Sunfunbun Replying to Sunfunbun

December 6, 2017

It was an avoidable turnover that changed the course of the game. The ensuing defense was also terrible but it wasn’t like that was the only mistake he made. He turned the puck over all night and for a guy who is going to make his bones in the NHL as a puck-mover, he has to make better decisions and execute at a much higher level. His ceiling is so much higher than he showed tonight and that was even with him making some nice passes along the way.

He can look good skating all he wants but tonight was a significant step back in his puck management, which is his number one attribute as an NHL defenseman. That’s the thing that will determine how successful he is at the NHL level and tonight he simply wasn’t good enough. That little slap pass he made in the first could have easily turned into a goal just as much as that brilliant play he made in the third could’ve turned into an Avs goal. But there was a whole lot more of one of those types of plays tonight than the other and that’s why he got the grade he did.

His possession numbers were fine but as a member of the losing team getting ice time late in the third, of course they pushed up over the positive hump. Barrie’s made a nice little recovery at the end because of the same thing. Get out there for a shift or two of a shooting gallery as a team hangs on to a one-goal lead and those numbers get distorted in a hurry.

I expect more from Girard with the puck and that’s why I gave him the grade he did.

Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

December 6, 2017

Much agreement here regarding your assessments, with no big discrepancies with my own. To simplify: There was one and only one Av who shined (or even turned in a good game), that of course being Nathan MacKinnon (A). Elsewhere: Noticeably bad game for Girard, dipsy-doodling not withstanding (D+), as well as for blue line partner Johnson (agree w/your D). I’m also going to mention the ineffectiveness of Jost (your C is generous). Barrie and Rantanen looked like, um, Barrie and Rantanen of late. And painfully poor games by Nieto and Kerfoot. Beyond this, mere quibbles: I might persuaded to give Soda a B-, Varly a C, and Zads a C-, for example. Your grade for Siemens is quite kind (bless your heart). I’ll turn your “N” for Grimaldi into a C-. I’ll save my team thoughts for another article, perhaps.

Thanks for being willing to try the coach-grading experiment. I didn’t see much that worked at all, and in fact did not see ‘much’, period. And ultimately a coach is judged by the product put forth on the ice. Not much to like in this one in that regard.

BTW, speaking of quibbles (tee-hee): Assuming you want the above list of personnel to appear in alphabetical order (except for Bednar), I guess we’d want Siemens before Soderberg, and Varlamov before Wilson, right? (wink)

Av-a-dabba-doo Replying to Av-a-dabba-doo

December 7, 2017

I’ll be honest here. I completely forgot to grade those guys and realized after I had finished there was no Wilson or Siemens and so I just tossed them in. Lol.

Replying to
Av-a-dabba-doo

Av-a-dabba-doo

December 7, 2017

Your honesty just turned a negative into a positive in my book. 🙂

mladen

mladen

December 6, 2017

Rants probably deserves an F because he’s playing so far beneath his ability. The whole team looked like they had something else on their minds. Even worse than against Dallas.

Nels

Nels

December 6, 2017

I totally agree with all the observations and grades here, except Compher deserves better than a D, it’s not his fault he’s being played as a first line winger. Rants and Jost look like they need to spend some time in the AHL, maybe Kerfoot too. I got no clue who they could be replaced by though. Maybe some of the Blues prospects? I wonder why Greer hasn’t been seen or discussed since Landy’s absence? At least it is starting to look like we’re going to have a legitimate shot at Rasmus Dahleen.

December 6, 2017

Love the Bednar grades finally coming. He, imo, has been far below average all season long. He rarely adjusts systems in time to counter the opposing coach. Its a game of chess and even if we have the better pieces out there, they can only do so much if the chessmaster puts them in the wrong places.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article