No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Colorado Avalanche Community!

Should Nikita Zadorov be included in any Duchene trade talks?

Adrian Dater
Adrian Dater
November 1, 2017
Should Nikita Zadorov be included in any Duchene trade talks?

Author

Adrian Dater avatar
Adrian Dater

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments (8 conversations)

November 1, 2017

I was thinking about this a few days ago, but how does Zadorov sitting help up the value?

Replying to

November 2, 2017

Great minds think alike

PK

PK

November 1, 2017

What if they traded both those guys for say… Erik Karlsson (since this is just theoretical). Get another Swede in the locker room…

Bob_W

Bob_W

November 1, 2017

I would say that if Zadorov were added to Duchene in a trade the return would have to skyrocket. If nobody will offer an equitable value for Duchene alone how are they going to give fair value for both? If and when a team becomes desparate enough they will give Sakic what he is asking for Duchene. If Sakic appears to be softening his askng price by throwing in other valuable players such as Zadorov then potential trading partners will try and take advantage. Joe shoud stick to his guns on Duchene’s value. There is no immediate urgency to deal Duchene. Already there are teams that not achieving up to expectations and desparation will follow.

November 1, 2017

I think that something like Duchene + a 2nd/3rd would be preferable. I think that the issue with Z is that he’s really difficult to value correctly. Duchene was in the same situation last year when he was in the long slump and I imagine other GMs are risk averse to some extent and wouldn’t be excited about the optics even if Z pays off for them in the long run.

Replying to

November 2, 2017

I should have mentioned this in the column, but adding Z to a potential trade allows the Avs to also ask for a little more besides a D. Like, say, a serviceable forward

Replying to

November 5, 2017

The Avs are full of ‘serviceable’ players. That’s why they’re not that good. The last couple games (and the last few years) seems to show that they need better D as opposed to a streaky goal scorer. I like Dutch, and wish this situation never happened (and can’t understand how they messed it up so much it’s come to this), but it seems to me if Compher and Jost come back and play half decent and the Avs have a top four D it would improve the team.

pixelrebirth

pixelrebirth

November 1, 2017

I dont think it looks great to trade the notable defenseman in the last big avs trade for a notable defenseman in a trade for Dutch and Z — that is far too high a price to pay and admits a complete failure on Z, I dont think anyone takes that deal sheerly because it is screaming we dont want Z

phawksmulder

phawksmulder

November 2, 2017

It’s not a bad idea if the return was a sure fire 1st-line D-man and peripheral pieces. Forward depth is mostly fine, considering a rebuilding team. Between Jost, Compher, and Soderberg it should be fine there for the year. With the D, losing Z, plug in a top shelf guy on the first pair next to Johnson, gives them a better top pair than they have now. There is currently enough depth to fill out those remaining bottom 3 around Barrie with Bigra, Barberio, Lindholm, and Mironov.

Personally, I’m not too worried about the way the trade looks if it makes the team better in the end. Wins make everything look good. Really the only hangup is getting a team to dump an actual 1st-line D-man young enough to care about. That seems unlikely, but those two guys do possess some good value so maybe it isn’t out of the question with some extra grease to the deal.

Dan G

Dan G

November 2, 2017

While Z is struggling and getting scratched, I am hesitant to trade him. We have seen how hard it is to get a hold of a top D-man here in Avs country and trading one away who has the potential to be a top guy only makes the task harder. The reason Sakic can’t get what he wants for Duchene is because he wants defense in return and top D are usually worth more than top forwards. Exhibit A: see the rarity of the straight up Jones for Johanson trade.

They need to move Duchene because he’s going to sign a UFA contract on July 1, 2019. Giving up on Z to accomplish that is not the answer.

Nels

Nels

November 2, 2017

Halloween is over AD, stop trying to scare my pants off by talking about either of these guys leaving. I still think the Duchene situation is the stupidest f*cking thing ever, and it’s a double nightmare if the Avs are going down that Duchene, Stasny, O’Reilly road with Z as well (which right now it looks like they might be). They need to play Z to let him develop and keep him happy, and Kroenke/Sakic need to be taking Duchene out to breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day and on their knees apologizing, gift baskets, whatever until he wants an extension. Why would anyone ever want to let either of those guys go instead of just cultivating their massive potential? Maybe if they felt good about their situation/team they wouldn’t under-perform. I understand the other perspective of “we need to get better play out of these guys or trade them”, but obviously there’s something going on with the Avs management that is bringing out the worst in guys.
What a mess.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article