No results found for ""

Type at least 3 characters to search

Upgrade Your Fandom

Join the ultimate Denver Nuggets Community!

Michael Malone selects his assistants, nudges Nuggets in right direction

Kalen Deremo
Kalen Deremo
July 6, 2015
Michael Malone selects his assistants, nudges Nuggets in right direction

Author

Kalen Deremo avatar
Kalen Deremo

Share this post

Comments

Leave a comment

3 Comments (1 conversation)

July 7, 2015

Looks like a nice mix. Golden State has an awesome defense, but has a better offense. You said we didn’t do well in defense. What was our defensive ranking over Karl’s regeim. I’m not sure you are correct, but let us know.

Replying to
Kalen Deremo

Kalen Deremo

July 7, 2015

Hey Charlie, thanks for the comment.

In terms of defensive efficiency under Karl the Nuggets ranked eight, ninth, sixth, eighth, 16th, 16th, 19th and 11th throughout his tenure in Denver, excluding his first half season with the team. That averages out to about 12th in the league during his eight and a half years as head coach. Under Brian Shaw the Nuggets ranked 21st and 26th. If you include those two years the Nuggets place about 14th in the league over the last decade in defensive efficiency.

For a team made the playoffs 80 percent of the time, nabbing the two, three and four seeds, setting a franchise record for wins and winning 50-plus games five years in a row (excluding the lockout-shortened season), ranking just above average in defense over that span isn’t very impressive. Not once were the Nuggets ranked top five in defensive efficiency, meanwhile they ranked below average 50 percent of the time over the last decade. And yet throughout this period Denver consistently ranked as one of the better offensive teams in the league, placing top 10 in offensive efficiency 60 percent of the time, including four separate top-five finishes and one year where they were the most efficient offense in the league. Of course, anybody who follows this team knows what this high-octane offense paired with a mediocre defense got them: only one year of post-first round basketball.

Again, defense is a culture. And the great thing about it is that it doesn’t require stars to implement. Just look at Milwaukee this year. They ranked second in defensive efficiency and gave the Bulls all they could handle in the first round despite missing their best player. Speaking of which, the Bulls have ranked as a top-10 defensive team five of the last six years and have advanced past the first round more than half that time despite being plagued by injuries. Same goes for teams like the Grizzlies, Spurs, Pacers, Hawks and Celtics. These are teams that place defense before offense, that honor defense as their religion, and because of this they consistently outperform what their talent suggests even through injuries and adversity. Why? Because defense is a mindset and a belief. It just takes effort. And when the chips are down, you always have it.

Anyway, hope this helps to clarify my position. As I said above, the best part about defense is that doesn’t require star athletes, just commitment. It’s great to finally have that level of commitment in Denver after decades of placing offense first.

Kalen Deremo Replying to Kalen Deremo

July 7, 2015

Kalen, first, thank you for the response! And second, thanks for answering the right way! You first paragraph could support a good offense being better than a good defense but only to a a point. The second paragraph could support defense being more critical, to a point. I wonder if there is a chart indicating ranking of the playoff teams in defense and offense for the last six years and how far they went in the playoffs. Say, add their position in offense and defense and then show their average playoff ranking. If not playoff, perhaps the top ten teams with the best records.

I do agree that defense is easier to overlook than offense. There is a reason Karl’s teams, although usually in the top 10 in defense didn’t go past the first round. But, they were almost always in the top 5 in offense due to his ‘taking chance on defense’ style.

I’m a little concerned that focusing on defense means slowing things down and am not sure how we can do that and run, which has to be worth 5 to 10 points above any adversary in the mile-high city.

One example of that, is Cleveland doing what they could to wait until 10 seconds before going for a shot. GS was the opposite and they finally wore Cleveland out (not withstanding other factors). Memphis failed also. Is GS offense first?

I love the idea about commitment equaling defense, as sans Mudiay, Barton and Ty, we really don’t have any super speedy guys, so they had better be committed.

DNVR Flag

Scroll for next article